I've heard that Wittgenstein is one of the few philosophers to actually make people optimistic. Does anyone here feel that way?
“People” for “definitely not women” in this case. Nor his brothers.
All of Wittgenstein is now public domain
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: All of Wittgenstein is now public domain
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
My thought on this, what's the difference to an agent between a real world an a simulated one? Why aren't all worlds effectively simulated?
You are basically asking if it's possible to know whether we live in a simulated world or not. That is a good question. One possible answer would be "It depends on the quality of the simulation". If we are living in a simulated world there could be a simulated drug the so-called red pill which allows you to see the execution of the simulation. If we started seeing Fortran source-code in the sky and the code would see…
Held together with Perl, don't forget. https://xkcd.com/224/
Re: All of Wittgenstein is now public domain
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
More context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_is_one_hand TL;DR: Descartes (and others): We can't know for certain that the external world exists. GE Moore: "Here is one hand, and here is another. There are at least two external objects in the world." Wittgenstein was pointing out that this doesn't address any of the actual claims. (I think "agree" is a confusing word to use in the translation. "Know" would work b…
Here is one hand, And here is another. There are at least two external objects in the world. Therefore, an external world exists. As if there would not be hands in a simulated world!
Re: All of Wittgenstein is now public domain
#64Re: All of Wittgenstein is now public domain
#65So now we can expect Wittgenstein fan-fic?
More we can expect Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus fanfic. Maybe some hot theorem-on-theorem action with stuff from Principia Mathematica.