0/10 for Xfinity as well on test-ipv6
United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
11–20 of 164 posts
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#12I'm pretty sure I have IPv6, I just haven't figured out how to set it up on my Mikrotik router :/
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#13Alas most Verizon Fios customers are still out of luck.
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#14Am I the only one that hates IPv6 ergonomics? I have to transcribe IPv4 addresses all the time, I'd hate to try and do it with a 128 bit address. Could they not have gone with 64 bit addresses, was 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 addresses really not enough?
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#15we only need to get to 70% adoption before the rest of us get it via herd immunity. won’t be long now
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#16In Facebook stats, the USA percentage is even higher (59%)
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#17In Facebook stats, the USA percentage is even higher (59%)
Might be that more people use Facebook on their phones. I'd guess Google is more representative of overall Internet usage.
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#180/10 for Xfinity as well on test-ipv6
I’ve used ipv6 on xfinity for years, but I do use my own equipment. Unless there are regional differences it’s important to make sure it is set up right in your router.
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#19Am I the only one that hates IPv6 ergonomics? I have to transcribe IPv4 addresses all the time, I'd hate to try and do it with a 128 bit address. Could they not have gone with 64 bit addresses, was 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 addresses really not enough?
Half the bits are unusable anyway...
Re: United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
#20Am I the only one that hates IPv6 ergonomics? I have to transcribe IPv4 addresses all the time, I'd hate to try and do it with a 128 bit address. Could they not have gone with 64 bit addresses, was 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 addresses really not enough?
As said in another reply, I've been in contact with IPv6 for like 20 years and every year I have to understand it again I fully agree with you and would even say that even 48 bits could have done something with 281,474,976,710,656 values possible