Live data from Hacker News

How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

fs.blog

11–20 of 136 posts

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#11
post #3

If you have taken upper level college STEM, or Philosophy courses, literally this is what they are trying to teach you.

1. The article quotes a famous essay by an Ivy League humanities prof lamenting that students aren’t taught to think any more. 2. STEM thinking doesn’t carry over well to social systems. Hayek devoted his career to this problem. I recommend reading his Nobel speech, “The Pretense of Knowledge”.

> an Ivy League humanities prof

...whose most popular professional contribution appears to be lamenting his own irrelevance from the comfort of an ivory tower with an endowment whose safe withdrawal rate is larger than many country's GDPs.

> STEM thinking doesn’t carry over well to social systems

1. Apparently is does. Otherwise the newspapers full of humanities folks would've won the advertising wars.

2. What the hell is "STEM thinking"?

2a. Is Philosophy "STEM thinking? OP mentioned philosophy, right? Although I can't pretend surprise at the notion that ignoring 1 of 2 examples counts as close reading these days in humanities departments.

2b. Is Geometry "STEM thinking"? Geometry has certainly been included in the western definition of liberal art for longer than Economics has been a science. Or a field. Or a word.

2c. Are esoteric prognostications on the nature of transubstantiation "STEM thinking"? What about (other) extremist propaganda that flames religious violence (today instead of far long ago)?

> Hayek

Even hard core leftist scientists would probably agree with Hayek's critique of the social sciences, none of which fall under the STEM umbrella.

Also, have fun with the ensuing flame war this is sure to trigger.

My contribution: Hayek always struck me as a very crisp thinker, but in terms of intent more of a high brow propagandist than a public intellectual. The Google ad engineers don't really give a shit about how you perceive various humidifiers, but do sincerely want you to click the ad. Hayek was the google ad engineer of his age, and was quite good at his job. Which isn't to say he didn't care. He did care. A lot. He was just a bit of a tool. But, crisp thinker. Good tool. Comfy life from it, too, and well-deserved. No judgement here.

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#12

I guess we can at least take shallow pleasure in the irony of an article entitled "How To Think" written with the style and substance of LinkedIn Spam.

Can you recommend something on the topic? I'm asking sincerely because I'm currently working on my personal study plan.

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#13
post #12

I guess we can at least take shallow pleasure in the irony of an article entitled "How To Think" written with the style and substance of LinkedIn Spam.

Can you recommend something on the topic? I'm asking sincerely because I'm currently working on my personal study plan.

This was posted a few months ago: https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-think-clearly-to-improve-und...

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#14
post #12

I guess we can at least take shallow pleasure in the irony of an article entitled "How To Think" written with the style and substance of LinkedIn Spam.

Can you recommend something on the topic? I'm asking sincerely because I'm currently working on my personal study plan.

Study something deeply under the direction of an expert critic. Repeat at least once. This is difficult to find -- even most colleges/unis don't provide it. Mastery takes years. Best to do this in your youth.

Unfortunately, there are no shortcuts. Without criticism, at least a couple times to mastery, it's extraordinarily difficult to differentiate confusion from clarity.

(Programming is a wonderful field because reality is such a harsh critic and experiments are free... your code either works or it doesn't, and the most expensive input to the compiler is measured in human heart beats. But the field is exceptionally rare in that respect.)

But also, as a general heuristic, it's safe to avoid 4 minute reads that promise to tell you something as grand as "How To Think".

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#16
post #15

How to think: think longer.

"I have spent endless nights thinking about who killed JKF. Surely, now, I know how to think clearly on the subject. Please come down to my basement where I have a special room dedicated to all the thinking I've done on this subject. And I have thought longer on this subject than anyone else, so clearly I know how to think on this subject."

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#17
For solving leetcode style problems:

(1) try the problem, meaning get to the logic for the solution and then

(2) implement your solution at least once

(3) read the solution

(4) scrutinize incredibly heavily why you got it wrong or why your code wasn’t as efficient as the ideal solution (5) build a map of the key learnings,

Rinse and repeat on new problems.

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#18

For solving leetcode style problems: (1) try the problem, meaning get to the logic for the solution and then (2) implement your solution at least once (3) read the solution (4) scrutinize incredibly heavily why you got it wrong or why your code wasn’t as efficient as the ideal solution (5) build a map of the key learnings, Rinse and repeat on new problems.

[deleted]

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#19

I guess we can at least take shallow pleasure in the irony of an article entitled "How To Think" written with the style and substance of LinkedIn Spam.

This style (and linkedin posts) remind me of one of Edward Tufte's observations, that business presentations and toddler's books have around the same words per page.

Re: How to Think: The Skill You’ve Never Been Taught

#20
> Schools don’t teach you a method of thinking

They do in the decade they spend trying to teach each kid math. It mostly fails though, but not because they aren't trying, teaching how to think to people who don't think well is really hard simply because they don't think well and therefore can't easily pick up what you try to teach them.

Post reply on HN