Live data from Hacker News

You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

bearbin.net

231–240 of 633 posts

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#231

Be ready for websites that make you pay to read them. They gotta make money to keep up somehow, and if they can't do it through ads, they will do it through subscription.

This is what the world needs. "Free" products and services mean you are the product or service.

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#232
post #219
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours Welcome to public spaces? Life involves maybe seeing things, idea, people you don’t like. That’s not inherently bad.

Then why is Coca Cola allowed to promote their proven harmful sugar juices in that space, but am I not allowed to oppose that promotion in the same space? What is allowed and tolerated in that public space is skewed, an unfair. Certainly not balanced.

> Then why is Coca Cola allowed to promote their proven harmful sugar juices in that space, but am I not allowed to oppose that promotion in the same space?

You are certainly allowed to. Pony up for the ad space if you want to promote the opposite, or advertise something else entirely.

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#233
post #169
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see nothing hypocritical about either of those. The vandal wasn’t sued by the artist who may have approved. In the second case I find greeting cars as objectionable as street billboards.

So you called that artist a "vandal". Would you also call Bansky a "vandal"? Some people find unapproved grafitti objectionable. How do you feel about that?

So I'm not trying to defend Banksy specifically here...

>So you called that artist a "vandal". Would you also call Bansky a "vandal"?

He can be both, "vandal" and "artist" aren't mutually exclusive.

>Some people find unapproved grafitti objectionable. How do you feel about that?

I'm not answering for the person you're responding to, but for me, I'd say I feel fine about that. There are people who find nudity in art objectionable; who object to the Mona Lisa; to surreal art; to abstract art; to land art; to a specific artist; to an artistic medium. There's always going to be someone who objects to some form of art, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fuck that indeed. Very strong message here, and I love it. I wish I could take all those ads and shove them into their asses. But what is being suggested here? What's mine to take? If I see an ad, can I reuse the artwork? No. If I see a car, I can't just copy it's design. Can I just paint over it, or rip it apart? No, that would be vandalism. As much as I hate ads, THEY have re-arranged the world by paying for it in…

> Can I just paint over it, or rip it apart? That's what Banksy does and says "yes" to. > No, that would be vandalism. So what? That's just a word. > As much as I hate ads, THEY have re-arranged the world by paying for it in a free market, and we must respect that. LOL, but why "must we"? You have no reasoning, no justification.

It's not just a word, it's a law, from UK's Criminal Damage Act 1971: "A person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any property belonging to another intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence."

But whether we should change that law is probably an off-topic here. All I am saying is that we must respect the law. If we don't agree with the law, we must try to change it, and not just go about destroying each other's property.

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#236
post #219
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours Welcome to public spaces? Life involves maybe seeing things, idea, people you don’t like. That’s not inherently bad.

Then why is Coca Cola allowed to promote their proven harmful sugar juices in that space, but am I not allowed to oppose that promotion in the same space? What is allowed and tolerated in that public space is skewed, an unfair. Certainly not balanced.

I think there's never an end to it.

A paleo fan will think the same about a vegan/carbs ad, and so would an anti-vaxxer about a conventional health poster.

Harmful ideas can, and will reach those who are susceptible to it. I think the right way to oppose harmful ideas, is by gaining the education that would allow you, and others in society to judge such ideas.

The alternative of forbidding ads in public, is essentially censorship and making society even weaker as one way or another, harmful ideas will reach each and every one of us, and when they do, the less susceptible we are, the better.

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's interesting, I use Photopea a lot. How did you start it, and what led you to going with ads/premium to unblock ads instead of charging premium for more features?

90% of my income is from ads. If I could not make money with my website, I would shut it down and would go get hired by some company.

[deleted]

Re: You block ads in your browser, why not in your city?

#239

It’s gotten so bad online that I do everything in my power to block them, prevent them, avoid them, and ignore them. I mute YouTube videos, I use adblock, and scroll right past the ads. I refuse to even look at them.

I recommend replacing Adblock (Plus) with Ublock Origin.

Also, for YouTube, check out the SponsorBlock browser plugin.

Post reply on HN