Live data from Hacker News

Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

utcc.utoronto.ca

471–480 of 519 posts

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#471
post #140

It’s not so bad to run your own email server. Im doing it, because email is very sensitive data, and I don’t want to share it with Google or Microsoft or any other cloud provider. The worst part is, that you can’t use any fancy email clients, because they all use proprietary protocols and once again cloud services. But imap and activesync works well enough too. The most important thing is, to get a clean IP address.…

> The worst part is, that you can’t use any fancy email clients, because they all use proprietary protocols and once again cloud services.

What fancy email clients did you have in mind that don't support IMAP?

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#472
post #140

It’s not so bad to run your own email server. Im doing it, because email is very sensitive data, and I don’t want to share it with Google or Microsoft or any other cloud provider. The worst part is, that you can’t use any fancy email clients, because they all use proprietary protocols and once again cloud services. But imap and activesync works well enough too. The most important thing is, to get a clean IP address.…

> The worst part is, that you can’t use any fancy email clients, because they all use proprietary protocols and once again cloud services. What fancy email clients did you have in mind that don't support IMAP?

More or less all iOS and Android mail clients.

https://www.imore.com/best-email-apps-your-iphone-and-ipad

They do support imap, but they process your messages on their proprietary cloud service. What sane person would agree to that?

In the US there seems to be not a lot of concern about data protection yet, so there seems to be a market for those services.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#473

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you put some decent effort [...] it works Well, I put in more than some decent effort, and I didn't get it "to work". I detailed my efforts here: https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-ser... Please stop spreading falsehoods. If you were able to somehow get your own email server to deliver email to Gmail and Outlook, great, good for you - but stop pretending that anybody can do it.

My mail server running on DigitalOcean has been relatively trouble free over the last 9 years. It runs docker-mailserver and is used by me and a dozen employees of my various small businesses. It requires some effort to maintain and understand, and I’ve had a few deliverability issues over the years but they are generally with niche providers. I’ve never had trouble sending mail to the big providers. Every time I rea…

That's what I've been using for some years and it's never been a problem for me. You are right that you have to have at least a basic understanding of how a mail server works, and there is some configuration to know about. But I think of all the things I host myself, docker-mailserver is the least cumbersome and among the most reliable.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#474
post #230
post #122

I would really say that "running your own email" is a set of things that can be done independently: - Getting your own domain and using a provider such as fastmail or proton is a first step that gives you lots of security fom arbitrary. Because you own the doorstep, you can change provider without having to inform all your contacts of the move. You're also more secure from unilateral moves from your provider. -Hostin…

Internet was meant to be decentralized. Lets leave it this way. I am running my server for 15 years and couldn't be more happy with "artisan" infrastructure. I don't want or use webmail (sluggish), I don't want others fingerpoking my emails, I don't want various compulsory registration systems (like requiring my phone number out of """security""" reasons like google), giving others the ability to kill my account and…

Are there any guide or books available on how to setup something like this?

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#475
post #468
post #122

I would really say that "running your own email" is a set of things that can be done independently: - Getting your own domain and using a provider such as fastmail or proton is a first step that gives you lots of security fom arbitrary. Because you own the doorstep, you can change provider without having to inform all your contacts of the move. You're also more secure from unilateral moves from your provider. -Hostin…

Might be a silly question, I own a domain that is my first initial + last name dot dev for my portfolio. What's a decent, or usual, prefix to use with such a domain as a personal email for job applications? Bonus point if it is English-French bilingual. contact@ sounds off, like I'm a corporation. email@ or mail@ I kind of like, but I'm afraid it sounds "confusing" (is that in my head?). application@ or job@ is not b…

hello@name.com

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#476
post #230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Internet was meant to be decentralized. Lets leave it this way. I am running my server for 15 years and couldn't be more happy with "artisan" infrastructure. I don't want or use webmail (sluggish), I don't want others fingerpoking my emails, I don't want various compulsory registration systems (like requiring my phone number out of """security""" reasons like google), giving others the ability to kill my account and…

What are the memory requirements for postfix, dovecot, and rspamd these days?

> What are the memory requirements for postfix, dovecot, and rspamd these days?

Approximately nothing. I run all my email infrastructure on the smallest available $5/mo Linode and it's way overprovisioned even so. I'd take a smaller VM if they offered one.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#477
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm running an email server and I can tell you that this is by and large not the case. If you put some decent effort into making sure that you don't send spam, try to monitor if anyone thinks you send spam and react when someone complains that you send spam (and stop it), it works. In my experience people telling these stories often do send spam, but they don't believe they do. ("It's not spam, it's a Newsletter. No,…

> If you put some decent effort [...] it works Well, I put in more than some decent effort, and I didn't get it "to work". I detailed my efforts here: https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-ser... Please stop spreading falsehoods. If you were able to somehow get your own email server to deliver email to Gmail and Outlook, great, good for you - but stop pretending that anybody can do it.

> but stop pretending that anybody can do it

I do it as well and apparently so do many others.

Not sure why it seems problematic for some, but it hasn't been an issue at all for me.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#478
post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you put some decent effort [...] it works Well, I put in more than some decent effort, and I didn't get it "to work". I detailed my efforts here: https://www.attejuvonen.fi/dont-send-email-from-your-own-ser... Please stop spreading falsehoods. If you were able to somehow get your own email server to deliver email to Gmail and Outlook, great, good for you - but stop pretending that anybody can do it.

Easy on generalizations, mate. I've been running my own mail server since mid '00s. Initially hosted with one of West coast Canadian colos and subsequently moved to an EU colo. Had some deliverability issues with Outlook and Yahoo, but these were episodic and rare even though I set up DKIM only last year and have been running with just SPF and DNS/PTR before that. I know at least a dozen of others with similar setups…

> I strongly suspect that attempting to run a mailserver on Digital Ocean, OVH, 1and1 and similar mass-hosting providers will not go well.

I run my mail server on Linode, no issues at all.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#479
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Running a email system for a few thousand users) > If so, were you able to successfully communicate with and/or reasonably work through whatever issue got you black-holed? Yes. Practically all black-lists have a de-list form that one can use, and most seem to auto-delist fairly fast as soon they don't get any more reports from honey-trap and other sources. We do have a few custom written ways to detect hacked accoun…

It's better now, but in the early days of organized blacklists (more than 20 years ago) it was somewhat chaotic. Many large ISPs ran their own blacklists and some were poorly managed. AOL was the worst of them all. Their admin staff was unprofessional and unresponsive when I provided a PoC for their defective spam control system. There are a few sites where you can plug in an IP address to see if it's on any blacklis…

Thanks for the link, I see my email server is on a few lists. I’ve heard that DigitalOcean isn’t good for email servers but I’ve been lax on investigating.

Now I have incentive, this is annoying. Maybe I need a static IP as well.

Re: Running your own email is increasingly an artisanal choice, not a practical one

#480

Also, a lot of software in the field has never made sense to me. I know what the parts do, but I couldn't tell you how to assemble it all. It all seems very old and seperate software more for historical reasons than anything else. I ran mailinabox for a year or two, but eventually I just didn't want to maintain a piece of software I didn't understand where the documentation seemed actively hostile and presumptuous ab…

Postfix and Dovecot are classic magic word projects - completely useless unless you can work out the magic words, and then they work fine. The docs for magic word projects never to seem to prioritise essentials. So [obscure feature someone last used in 1984] gets equal billing with [essential fundamentals] and you have no idea which is which because - you haven't understood the docs yet. I'm still running my own serv…

IMO the postfix documentation is particularly good.
Post reply on HN