11–20 of 249 posts
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €6,500,000 on Grindr for not collecting users' valid consent for sharing data with third parties for profiling and advertising purposes from the Grindr App. Particularly interesting is that it is not allowed under GDPR to have a free version of an app with the condition that it shares personal data (in this case for targeting and profiling for ads) as the cons…
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €6,500,000 on Grindr for not collecting users' valid consent for sharing data with third parties for profiling and advertising purposes from the Grindr App. Particularly interesting is that it is not allowed under GDPR to have a free version of an app with the condition that it shares personal data (in this case for targeting and profiling for ads) as the cons…
> In light of all the relevant criteria of Article 83 described above in sections 6.3-6.4, we consider that the imposition of a fine of NOK 65 000 000 is effective, proportionate and dissuasive in the present case.
https://www.datatilsynet.no/contentassets/8ad827efefcb489ab1...
This is approximately 6.49M EUR.
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €6,500,000 on Grindr for not collecting users' valid consent for sharing data with third parties for profiling and advertising purposes from the Grindr App. Particularly interesting is that it is not allowed under GDPR to have a free version of an app with the condition that it shares personal data (in this case for targeting and profiling for ads) as the cons…
> Sharing Grindr's users personal data with advertising partners for online behavioural advertising purposes was not necessary for the performance of the Grindr's services.
Charging money for your services is also not necessary for the performance of the said services. Still businesses are luckily still allowed to charge money. Why can't data be considered as a means of payment in this case?
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €6,500,000 on Grindr for not collecting users' valid consent for sharing data with third parties for profiling and advertising purposes from the Grindr App. Particularly interesting is that it is not allowed under GDPR to have a free version of an app with the condition that it shares personal data (in this case for targeting and profiling for ads) as the cons…
Yes this is limiting the free market but it's a conscious decision.
It's still allowed to process data for your own analytics (e.g. to improve your offer) and make use of third party services. What the GDPR aims to prevent is your data being shared with the whole world way beyond the entity with which you originally interacted.
If that means services cannot finance themselves through advertising anymore then so be it.
For those confused about the fine amount, here is the quote from the original source: > In light of all the relevant criteria of Article 83 described above in sections 6.3-6.4, we consider that the imposition of a fine of NOK 65 000 000 is effective, proportionate and dissuasive in the present case. https://www.datatilsynet.no/contentassets/8ad827efefcb489ab1... This is approximately 6.49M EUR.
>The NO DPA reviewed the fine announced in its draft decision (10,000,000 €) on the basis that the revenue of Grindr (seems to-this part is redacted) seems different and that Grindr has made with the aim to remedy the deficiencies in their previous CMP.
Draft decision: https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Datatilsynet_-_DT-20/0213...
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of €6,500,000 on Grindr for not collecting users' valid consent for sharing data with third parties for profiling and advertising purposes from the Grindr App. Particularly interesting is that it is not allowed under GDPR to have a free version of an app with the condition that it shares personal data (in this case for targeting and profiling for ads) as the cons…
Interesting indeed, it is what several German online newspapers do - they let you choose between a free version with tracking and a paid one without one. I find this argument a bit weird though: > Sharing Grindr's users personal data with advertising partners for online behavioural advertising purposes was not necessary for the performance of the Grindr's services. Charging money for your services is also not necessa…
It's a political decision that charging money (or displaying not personalized ads) is preferably.
The sooner companies start to realize that personal data is a liability rather than an asset the better. Happy to see this fine, but as far as I'm concerned given the kind of data we're talking about here it should have been higher.