Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
#2Re: Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
#3For everything else, it’s easy to either generate webp alternates to jpeg/png and use a picture element (for non-responsive srcset, only three inner elements are required for this), or to use Cloudflare or an image CDN that automatically serves webp. Usually a project that requires a framework or SaaS that can’t easily support one can use the other.
Re: Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
#4We use it without fallback where development budget is low and the audience is mostly up to date and/or predominantly mobile. For everything else, it’s easy to either generate webp alternates to jpeg/png and use a picture element (for non-responsive srcset, only three inner elements are required for this), or to use Cloudflare or an image CDN that automatically serves webp. Usually a project that requires a framework…
Re: Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
#5Not joking, either.
Re: Ask HN: Do you use WebP without a fallback yet?
#6As others have said: if the bulk of your traffic is people using the latest hardware, then polyfills are probably overkill. If you need to cater for more niche target audience using legacy hardware, then by all means, use polyfills.