Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Just hit 3 mo. at new startup and the work is disinteresting

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–8 of 8 posts

Ask HN: Just hit 3 mo. at new startup and the work is disinteresting

#1

Post by 71a54xd »

Just hit three months at a new full remote startup I joined. The job provided a nice 30% pay bump from my last job, decent benefits and seemingly cool work based in Elixir (which is what I've been working on the most over the past two years). However, after "ramping up" they aren't even using elixir for beam and the work is wholly un-interesting. Curious if I should stick it out or go back to leetcoding / interview grind and land something new for the beginning of 2022? I'm 27 with 4yrs experience and what's scaring me is that staying here would make my engineering rigor / ability worse. New job would need at least a 20% bump from my current comp - also considering actually taking the plunge and going for a faang / growth stage.

Any advice or recs for hybrid work startups / companies in NYC are also appreciated!

cheers ;)

Re: Ask HN: Just hit 3 mo. at new startup and the work is disinteresting

#3

Post by 71a54xd »

tucaz wrote: post #2

How is the work “disinteresting” and what would have to happen for it to become interesting?

The tickets I've been given for onboarding have been poorly put together as the remote QA / reviewing process was horribly documented. The problems I was told I'd be working on turned out to be far more "in planning mode" than actually something they wanted people to work on. Two key engineers seem to dominate all of the meaty work and what was explained as a cool groundbreaking platform is really a boring accounting app written in elixir.

The most interesting ticket I've been given is re-writing how we do auth for certain clients. I need to get out of here.

Re: Ask HN: Just hit 3 mo. at new startup and the work is disinteresting

#5

Post by rboyd »

71a54xd wrote: post #3
tucaz wrote: post #2

How is the work “disinteresting” and what would have to happen for it to become interesting?

The tickets I've been given for onboarding have been poorly put together as the remote QA / reviewing process was horribly documented. The problems I was told I'd be working on turned out to be far more "in planning mode" than actually something they wanted people to work on. Two key engineers seem to dominate all of the meaty work and what was explained as a cool groundbreaking platform is really a boring accounting…

You mentioned 4 yoe before this. What were those years like? Asking because the current situation you describe doesn't sound super atypical to me.

Re: Ask HN: Just hit 3 mo. at new startup and the work is disinteresting

#6

Post by tucaz »

71a54xd wrote: post #3
tucaz wrote: post #2

How is the work “disinteresting” and what would have to happen for it to become interesting?

The tickets I've been given for onboarding have been poorly put together as the remote QA / reviewing process was horribly documented. The problems I was told I'd be working on turned out to be far more "in planning mode" than actually something they wanted people to work on. Two key engineers seem to dominate all of the meaty work and what was explained as a cool groundbreaking platform is really a boring accounting…

Isn’t it possible that you are not as ready as you think and that your leaders do not yet trust you to help them with more important stuff?

Could you use this opportunity to improve their process or even “teach” the company and team mates a few things here and there?

How about you show some leadership and drive them to where you think the team/company should go?

As I accumulated experience and worked with hundreds of people I found that people are most likely to complain and want things to be different but very rarely they want to change themselves or lead the change. The ones who do are the ones who succeed.

Just food for thought.

Post reply on HN