Live data from Hacker News

DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

bis.org

91–100 of 140 posts

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This, but applied to crypto bagholders

no one depends on their cryptocurrency like their salary or retirement savings. the total market capitalization of cryptocurrency is basically the total amount of wealth humanity is willing to just throw away

Weird how every time there's a crash there's suicide hotline posts on all the subreddits and crypto news websites then

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Human intervention is required more than you might think in the current banking system. Mistakes, fat fingered numbers, wrong accounts etc. None of it is resolved without humans with authority. Unless you can build an authority into the system somehow for dispute resolution, the system will always favour bad actors and fraud. The big push for no-authority, decentralised finance sounds wonderful, but the reality is if…

1. I wonder how much of this still holds in a potential future world where machines are making decisions in most aspects of life already. 2. It doesn't follow that you can't have some recognized authorities within decentralized finance to negotiate fallback cases. For instance, the role of banks could become merely to supply information related to human authentication, not most of market operation.

I guess you could set it up that way, but then you create the problem of competing authorities - it's the same problem that the internet has with DNS. At some point, it has to have a single source of truth. The blockchain itself isn't enough when what is recorded on the blockchain is potentially not what the actors intended (or is what a criminal intended in a fraud scheme).

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#94
post #92

How do so many coins offer absurd APRs for staking?

It's the same principle as junk bonds. The less people believe that their principle will be recovered, the higher the APR to incentivize buyers. If some $100 coin offers you 100% APR, you best believe it's not likely that your original coin is still going to be worth $100 at the end of the year. More likely you'll have 2 coins worth $50 each now.

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#95
post #60
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, that's the point, 1) you need 100% collateral, 2) the collateral needs to be in the form of digital tokens and 3) it needs to be kept in custody by a third party (the "smart contract"). Yes, you can still do useful things despite these limitations, but at the same time be aware that 99% of the borrowing/lending activity that goes on in the real world is not possible with this technology.

This really sounds most like gambling. And not a financial instruments that is very supportive for economy. Like let's say company loaning money to purchase equipment.

Yes, these loans can't be used to fund investment or consumption in the real economy. The only use-case of crypto-loans, as far as I know, is making leveraged bets on the prices of crypto-currencies.

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#98
post #61

About BIS: The BIS mission is to support central banks' pursuit of monetary and financial stability through international cooperation, and to act as a bank for central banks. > It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.

Just in: The central bank of central banks (BIS) is propagandizing against the decentralization of the banking system. To the surprise of no one.

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#99
post #61

About BIS: The BIS mission is to support central banks' pursuit of monetary and financial stability through international cooperation, and to act as a bank for central banks. > It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.

This, but applied to crypto bagholders

The psychological momentum of BIS far exceeds that of crypto. BIS and affiliated parties are comprised of thousands of old guard who have built their career and sense of self worth on the belief what they are doing is necessary and beneficial for society. Crypto participants are at max involved a few years and overwhelmingly young 20-somethings.

Just as science advances one funeral at a time, so too will this whole industry. It will help if we just stop debating whether crypto assets are real to begin with, and accept that this stuff isn't going away.

Re: DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This, but applied to crypto bagholders

no one depends on their cryptocurrency like their salary or retirement savings. the total market capitalization of cryptocurrency is basically the total amount of wealth humanity is willing to just throw away

[deleted]
Post reply on HN