All Bitcoin private keys are on this website

Post by 2-718-281-828 » Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 2:05 PM UTC

Ensorceled wrote: post #215

2-718-281-828 wrote: post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you are missing something. If you have a wallet with very little or no money attached to it. And the you check for the correspoinding private key. If you find it - you "know" it works and then _might_ be inclined to try the key for a more serious wallet. But if not, then you know this site doesn't work and would have no inclination to try another key. If you enter important passwords or keys into random websi…

No, I am not. Follow along: I check my $100 dollar wallet. It's there, doesn't get emptied. Cool, I think! Next day I check my $1000000 wallet. It gets immediately emptied. Alternatively: I check my $100 dollar wallet. It gets emptied. SCAMMER I scream on HN and Twitter. Site gets shutdown. Silly person doesn't check their $1000000 wallet.

Post by authed » Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 2:08 PM UTC

        -1 !== a.indexOf("1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm,") && (a = a.replace("1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm,", ""), r("5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf", 0, 1213)),
        -1 !== a.indexOf(",1JPbzbsAx1HyaDQoLMapWGoqf9pD5uha5m") && (a = a.replace(",1JPbzbsAx1HyaDQoLMapWGoqf9pD5uha5m", ""), r("5Km2kuu7vtFDPpxywn4u3NLpbr5jKpTB3jsuDU2KYEqetqj84qw", 0, 19)),
        -1 !== a.indexOf("1BFhrfTTZP3Nw4BNy4eX4KFLsn9ZeijcMm,") && (a = a.replace("1BFhrfTTZP3Nw4BNy4eX4KFLsn9ZeijcMm,", ""), r("5KJp7KEffR7HHFWSFYjiCUAntRSTY69LAQEX1AUzaSBHHFdKEpQ", 0, 165)),
        axios.get(n + a).then((function(e) {
            keys.forEach((function(t) {
                o(3e3).then((function() {
                    var n = e.data[t.pub];
                    void 0 !== n && r(t.wif, n.final_balance / 1e8, n.n_tx)
                }))
            }))
        }))
        ,
        isOnFirstPage ? (a = keys.slice(1).map((function(e) {
            return e.cpub
        })).join(","), r("5HpHagT65TZzG1PH3CSu63k8DbpvD8s5ip4nEB3kEsreAnchuDf", 0, 24)) : a = keys.map((function(e) {
            return e.cpub

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 2:13 PM UTC

codeflo wrote: post #100

5e92cb50239222b wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The magnitude of 2^256 is close to the count of atoms in the entire observable universe. I've always heard that even 2¹²⁸ is significantly larger than that number (which is closer to 2⁸⁰). This page seems to support that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe#Matter_con...

Look more carefully, the estimation according to Wikipedia is 10^80, which is roughly 2^266. (BTW, when converting 10^x to 2^x, times 3 is what I use for very rough back of the envelope estimations. Times 10/3 is actually almost precise, as log2(10) = 3.32…)

Post by teekert » Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 2:15 PM UTC

henvic wrote: post #204

teekert wrote: post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And then, when you "hit the jackpot", will you become a thief? Or will you just feel like you picked a lock, smile and pull the door back shut.

Why a thief? Bitcoin is a silly idea based on scarcity that doesn't exist. If someone generated the right numbers by chance and had luck, I wouldn't say they'd be doing anything wrong getting whatever is there. It's not the same as stealing data, and is not the same as hacking into a banking system. It's decentralized, and there isn't the concept of real scarcity. It's not even hacking. https://henvic.dev/posts/bitco…

Post by wyldfire » Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 2:17 PM UTC

theden wrote: post #216

uniqueuid wrote: post #206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ignoring the prospects, this is a neat case to explain sharing memory in multiprocessing. You're reading the file in every process, this needs mem x N for N processes. If you first read in the file, create the set, and then use multiprocessing, you will get forked processes sharing the parent's memory, i.e. only need 1 x N the memory.

I haven't grokked shared memory in python yet to implement it ( https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.shared_mem... ). Apparently there is also a known bug? ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14124588/shared-memory-i... ), but an improvement I'd like to learn and implement. Though the file I have is just over 1GB, so it's not prohibitive yet. Funny thing is even though it's throwaway code, ensuring eve…