Every time I've shown this to the designers, (full design team at a corporation, single designer at a startup, small design team) everyone says it looks cool but then it never gets used because nobody on the team has any experience using After Effects and no one has time to learn for cool looking but ultimately superfluous animations.
Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
41–50 of 115 posts
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#42I recently threw together a React page that included some Lottie’s. Impressive! Had a couple issues with bundled bitmap assets but pretty easily overcome with Data URIs. I’ll definitely keep it in the ol’ tool-belt. https://theworkingassembly.com/labs
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#43Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#44I hate to say it but man, I miss Flash!! The websites, interactions and animations we were able to create in it 20 years ago..! There is still nothing that comes close to productivity and quality of output. I am disappointed that Adobe butchered Flash and wasn’t able to come up with modern and mobile friendly version. The war with Apple should have pushed them forward. Instead they gave up.
ActionScript and Flex were more powerful than JavaScript and HTML, still the latter won because it was open.
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#45Sadly Lottie is a huge dependency, for one or two animations I find it wasteful to even add it. Another downside is that your lighthouse score gets negatively affected since the animation is seen as busy time so your time until interactive becomes very long. I'm always looking for a smaller alternative
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#46[1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/bodymovin-to-smil [2] https://bundlephobia.com/package/lottie-web@5.8.1 [3] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=482689 [4] https://caniuse.com/svg-smil [5] https://bookem.com
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#47Sadly Lottie is a huge dependency, for one or two animations I find it wasteful to even add it. Another downside is that your lighthouse score gets negatively affected since the animation is seen as busy time so your time until interactive becomes very long. I'm always looking for a smaller alternative
lazy load it
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#48This is more efficient than pngs or gifs, no question. But modern browsers do movies (like, mp4 and ogg) really well, with no required chrome, a rendering engine that is very good and easily controlled by js. I wonder how a animation in Lottie compares to a embedded video tag of the same animation. Isn't js JIT (slower), and evaluated higher in the stack (slower) than the video renderer?
Video codecs are designed primarily for imagery coming from a camera. They don't cope with sharp edges like vector shapes especially well - edges get blurry and blocky. Videos are also not scalable; if you stretch them for a bigger screen or zoom in, they get pixelated. You can encode with more sharpness or higher resolution, but that makes your files bigger. Little uses a vector format, so the results are sharp what…
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#49Posted this because I wanted to start a discussion on the ecosystem and workflows around Lottie and animations on the web. Here are some alternative programs I found that can export Lottie files: https://www.haikuanimator.com/ https://glaxnimate.mattbas.org/
Re: Lottie – Use after effects animations in web and native apps
#50I hate to say it but man, I miss Flash!! The websites, interactions and animations we were able to create in it 20 years ago..! There is still nothing that comes close to productivity and quality of output. I am disappointed that Adobe butchered Flash and wasn’t able to come up with modern and mobile friendly version. The war with Apple should have pushed them forward. Instead they gave up.
Again, mindset beat technology. ActionScript and Flex were more powerful than JavaScript and HTML, still the latter won because it was open.