We have a chance to notice this when it's mediated by a browser. Native apps don't barf all over the console and thus escape such scrutiny. I first considered this when a friend told me about a brand of lawnmower of which I had never heard let alone searched (mowing lawns is the least interesting activity I can imagine), and one minute later a podcast app had a big banner at the top by which I could purchase a lawnmo…
But mobile apps are required to ask for mic/camera permissions.
An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
21–30 of 280 posts
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#22Is this just click bait? I don't know the intricacies of Google's ad serving, but is this not just someone (e.g., an ads customer) slipping a request for camera and mic access into an ad script? But the title seems to suggest Google is doing something malicious here.
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#23This sounds like one small piece of common fingerprinting techniques. It would have been nice to see the author address that possibility, but it seems fingerprinting is not mentioned.
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#24We have a chance to notice this when it's mediated by a browser. Native apps don't barf all over the console and thus escape such scrutiny. I first considered this when a friend told me about a brand of lawnmower of which I had never heard let alone searched (mowing lawns is the least interesting activity I can imagine), and one minute later a podcast app had a big banner at the top by which I could purchase a lawnmo…
This is why data privacy is so important even if you feel like you have nothing to hide.
0: as you note, they technically have the ability to do so and random apps could be but the amount of effort it would take to record, transcribe, and evaluate that much data just isn’t worth it when most users voluntarily give their info anyway. This is why I don’t use a phone, browser, or email service created by an ad tech company though and it boggles my mind how many people are ok with that.
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#25Is this just click bait? I don't know the intricacies of Google's ad serving, but is this not just someone (e.g., an ads customer) slipping a request for camera and mic access into an ad script? But the title seems to suggest Google is doing something malicious here.
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#26Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#27Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#28Is this just click bait? I don't know the intricacies of Google's ad serving, but is this not just someone (e.g., an ads customer) slipping a request for camera and mic access into an ad script? But the title seems to suggest Google is doing something malicious here.
I don't know if this looks any better if Google is negligent/incompetent instead of malicious.
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#29HTTP contains JavaScript, and theoretically anything can be executed within the browser (I've seen people mining bitcoins!).
Google can't monitor an execute every HTML snippet, but they doing pretty great job sampling responses and evaluating some of them. Fraudsters are smart, and trying to understand if the code is executed on Google's servers, but overall they are loosing.
It seems like a case where google's system didn't work.
By they way, all google partners are listed here: https://developers.google.com/third-party-ads/adx-vendors. Usually, it's possible to track down who's exactly responsible by looking at dev console
Re: An iframe from googlesyndication.com tries to access the camera and microphone
#30Shitty ad code barfing errors onto the console is typical, unfortunately. The JS is not written by Google, it's written by the individual advertiser, with very limited oversight.
I think I found the problem.