Live data from Hacker News

The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

#2
Good. I've noticed more job opportunities that stress a remote(/hybrid) nature the past couple of months, and I greatly appreciate it. As long as there are options for those who need them (being in the office because the home situation is too distracting vs needing to WFH because someone's coming to fix a pipe), I think it works.

Employees have shown they get the work done (and are working more hours with the lack of a commute + water cooler time which is its own issue). There are reasons that being on-site job necessary of course, but if the only one is the employer is paranoid and wants to hover over their employees, that says more about them.

Granted, all the landlords who have or are building massive office blocks might be in trouble, but frankly they can deal with it.

Re: The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

#6
I’m seeing a big push in the corporate world to get workers back in offices. Any idea why? Is it just the rent they’re paying and they want that to be got a reason? Is it that CxO’s believe we’ll all produce better work off in the office? Something else?

Re: The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

#7
post #6

I’m seeing a big push in the corporate world to get workers back in offices. Any idea why? Is it just the rent they’re paying and they want that to be got a reason? Is it that CxO’s believe we’ll all produce better work off in the office? Something else?

At the C-suite level, the bottom line should be the biggest concern. If productivity is as good or better than before, then the obvious choice is to reduce facility related expenses, have more offsite workers and make more profit.

Middle management (and/or CxO’s as you refer to them) will want to return to status quo because the job of aligning the workforce under corporate policies becomes so much harder when the workforce is not in one location. The roles of middle management will need to change in the new work model, and nobody really likes change.

For startups, I think that companies smaller than 50 employees and less than 3 years old will likely not do as well in a distributed work environment. There just isn’t enough common culture or process to make it work, in my opinion.

Re: The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

#8
post #6

I’m seeing a big push in the corporate world to get workers back in offices. Any idea why? Is it just the rent they’re paying and they want that to be got a reason? Is it that CxO’s believe we’ll all produce better work off in the office? Something else?

At the C-suite level, the bottom line should be the biggest concern. If productivity is as good or better than before, then the obvious choice is to reduce facility related expenses, have more offsite workers and make more profit. Middle management (and/or CxO’s as you refer to them) will want to return to status quo because the job of aligning the workforce under corporate policies becomes so much harder when the wo…

> For startups, I think that companies smaller than 50 employees and less than 3 years old will likely not do as well in a distributed work environment. There just isn’t enough common culture or process to make it work, in my opinion.

It is possible this is why some startups will fail sooner.

It is possible this is why some pre IPO private buyouts will be less likely, there won't be enough "there" there to acquire as a work culture or visible asset holding outcome.

But I personally believe the ones which survive being more WFH will be more resilient long-term and make more persisting value long term.

So I half agree and half disagree. Founder-Vesting-VC wins may be net smaller in my case. That's a downside for one point of view.

Re: The Five-Day Office Week Isn’t Coming Back. WFH Is Here to Stay

#9
post #6

I’m seeing a big push in the corporate world to get workers back in offices. Any idea why? Is it just the rent they’re paying and they want that to be got a reason? Is it that CxO’s believe we’ll all produce better work off in the office? Something else?

At the C-suite level, the bottom line should be the biggest concern. If productivity is as good or better than before, then the obvious choice is to reduce facility related expenses, have more offsite workers and make more profit. Middle management (and/or CxO’s as you refer to them) will want to return to status quo because the job of aligning the workforce under corporate policies becomes so much harder when the wo…

Personally speaking, the big split is if I actually have to collaborate with someone or not. If I just need to focus on writing code, wfh is great. But if i actually need to design something, use a whiteboard, and have a conversation, it's a million times easier in the office.

This is why I think productivity went up in the short term, companies had plenty of stuff in their backlogs already and WFH let it get done faster. Give it a few years though and I'm expecting product and feature quality to start going down.

Post reply on HN