Live data from Hacker News

Kinesis Advantage 360

kinesis-ergo.com

211–220 of 339 posts

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#211
I've using a Kinesis Advantage for 10 years now. I got my Kinesis after switching to Dvorak, which maybe (maybe) improved my typing speed, but more importantly — I had to re-learn how to type, and get rid of all the quirks that come with learning how to type by yourself very early in one's life.

That is to say, it made the transition to Kinesis Advantage a breeze.

I cannot speak for how its ergonomic might or might not translate into helping with RSI, but having constant back/neck/other joints pains since I was 15, one change that I introduced to my (variable height) desk last year was, at least for me, more dramatic than any other: I installed a keyboard drawer, which enable me to align my Mirra's arm rest with the keyboard (my desk and most other variable height desks do not go low enough to allow that).

The Advantage 360 could improve my setup as and I might get it just to be able to rest my arms at my shoulders natural width, which for me should be slightly wider than the regular Advantage.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#212
This looks great! I’m happy with my ergodox ez, but now that kinesis has a split keyboard with qmk support it’s nice to see the competition in this space.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#213
post #31

I recently replaced the controller on my advantage2 to support qmk[0]. Using multiple layers lets me avoid the tiny rubber f-keys and move the arrow keys to hjkl along with a few other tweaks. I wish kinsis would make qmk support a default option. Custom layouts and layers are just too useful for me to give up. [0] https://github.com/kinx-project/kint

Yea, I have an advantage pro but it's been collecting dust since I got a qmk keyboard. I'm not paying for proprietary firmware anymore, and since Kinesis' poor handling of their sticky modifier key bug (that existed and was well known for what, a decade or two?) I'm not keen on paying them anything at all anyway.

And in case anyone's wondering what I'm talking about, back when I was about to buy my Kinesis, just about every user report I could find online mentioned that sometimes the modifiers get stuck. I really hoped that was just a coincidence, but no, my new keyboard did the same thing, and when I asked other users I came across along the way, they all said it's a regular thing with the Kinesis Advantage.

Some tried to get Kinesis to repair it but response ranged from not acknowledging the issue at all and playing oblivious, or blaming the computer, sometimes offering to replace a circuit board in the keyboard (this does not fix the problem).

There's also this 2016 web.archive.org snapshot where Kinesis is blaming the computer for missing the upstroke (what a joke to anyone who has the slightest clue of how USB or the input stack in your favorite kernel works): https://web.archive.org/web/20160221095425/http://www.kinesi...

The reality is that it's all in their firmware and looks like it took them nearly two decades to fix (if not more, I'm not sure exactly how far back the issue goes.. I think some people claim it was also happening with the old PS/2 model!) with the release of Advantage 2.

More anecdotes here, it was discussed when the Advantage 2 released: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12237836

Nice keyboard but it really left me with a "shitty company" taste. And yeah, shitty proprietary firmware.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Moonlander is also missing F-keys? People can swear up and down how intuitive and natural layers are, but I do not care. If there is ever a decision to be made between more and fewer keys, I always want to default to more.

Keyboard people are a bit too enthusiastic about cutting out a few dozen keys only to add them back in layers.

Surely you don't expect people using keyboards without dedicated function keys (or number rows) are aiming to never need to use those keys?

The trade-off from fewer keys is reduced hand movement (& a smaller keyboard, cheaper to buy switches for, etc.), at the cost of additional complexity of use, & it not really being easy for anyone else to use your keyboard.

It seems reasonable either way to prefer one or the other. -- I suspect that most of the people enthusiastic about the smaller keyboard layouts are also into keyboard-driven workflows, and are developers who also frequently need to use the symbols accessed using layers.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

looks like there is a function layer. Layers are nice because they make it so you don't have to move your hands far from home row.

I've had such a bad experience with the macbook layering (touchbar too), I feel like it might be more hassle having to turn the layer on and then press the key. Whereas with a dedicated fn row, it would be a lot easier. I'm quite happy with my adv2, but I can't wait for the reviews.

if the layer button is easily accessible, it isn't so bad imo. I have a function layer available just by moving my thumbs one button "inward" from resting position and I love it. It seems I like layers more than a lot of people though so *shrug.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#218
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're using layers already, it's a small step to just add dedicated keys for those things in a layer. So that becomes LayerX + 9, or LayerX + R (for rebuild), or whatever combination you want.

But at this point you are just fixing an invented problem with more tasks to be done. A lot of these custom keyboards could just have been built with more of the standard keys.

Pessimistic: "without the full set of keyswitches, you need to use fancy tricks to make shortcuts usable".

Optimistic: "with fancy tricks, you can make shortcuts easily accessible without the need for the full set of keyswitches".

e.g. on my keyboard I have shortcuts for "goto desktop left" when I press "cv", (and "goto desktop right" when I press "m,"). This is more complex than a standard keyboard's Ctrl+Shift+Right (or whatever, as varies per OS), but it feels so convenient.

Re: Kinesis Advantage 360

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Keyboard people are a bit too enthusiastic about cutting out a few dozen keys only to add them back in layers.

Surely you don't expect people using keyboards without dedicated function keys (or number rows) are aiming to never need to use those keys? The trade-off from fewer keys is reduced hand movement (& a smaller keyboard, cheaper to buy switches for, etc.), at the cost of additional complexity of use, & it not really being easy for anyone else to use your keyboard. It seems reasonable either way to prefer one or the othe…

> Surely you don't expect people using keyboards without dedicated function keys (or number rows) are aiming to never need to use those keys?

I could imagine that some people never use the function keys. Or never use the numpad keys. To some people they might be completely useless... Which would make a smaller keyboard understandable.

Now, people who do need all those keys and yet still go for a smaller keyboard is harder for me to understand. :)

> The trade-off from fewer keys is reduced hand movement (& a smaller keyboard, cheaper to buy switches for, etc.), at the cost of additional complexity of use, & it not really being easy for anyone else to use your keyboard.

The trade-offs seem a bit one-sided. Hand movements are not a big deal unless you are going constantly back and forth between the main part and the nav cluster or the numpad. And all of these custom keyboards with their 60%, 67.5%, etc. sizes are already so… boutique and expensive that I don’t think that people are forfeiting a dozen or so keys in order to save some money.

Post reply on HN