Google Drive could soon start locking your files
81–90 of 193 posts
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#82Get a Synology NAS, you will not regret having data sovereignty
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#83I have, uh, mp3 backups of all the music I have owned from my, um, ludicrously massive CD collection. Is it worth the risk that google might one day decide I am a pirate and block my account?
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#84Aside from legitimate DMCAs what I'm worried about is losing backupped files of any sort because some rogue individual files a complaint on stuff they don't own or because of an ML error and an inexistent customer service by Google. Also I don't really like the service to sneak onto any files I upload. What alternatives do we have for cloud file backup? I already do full backups, need something to sync files between…
I totally switched off Dropbox when they limited the number of devices. Self host owncloud on a VPS, am very happy. From time to time I have to occ:upgrade something et voilà. Used for syncing, not backing up.
It helps that I can install and maintain it though, wouldn't recommend it to anyone without a bit of wed/IT experience or the time to lean some basics.
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#85I will never forget that the Christchurch shooting video was automatically deleted from users' PRIVATE Google Drive and Dropbox - no warnings were given and no explanation was presented.
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whaaat? Link please
They removed it after they began using GIFCT to ‘prevent terrorists and violent extremists from exploiting digital platforms.’ All hashed versions of that video was removed from user accounts. Page 16 : https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocument...
Am I missing something here?
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#87Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
For reference, I use FLAC instead of MP3. Your collection may be larger, but my ~12,000 FLAC files take less than 500GB. So I'd say it's a question of value: You could have redundant copies of your music for ~$300 CAD with a pair of Samsung T5 SSDs, or you could someday lose every email, contact, photo, document, Youtube playlist, and MP3 you use Google for. I'm not saying it's likely, but it only has to be a one-in-…
How redundant are SSDs actually? I've been doing offline backups, but the OCD kicks in and I start wondering how many I should actually have and how often I should replace them...
If you really care about the data, two+ backups stored in different places is completely reasonable. Note that "places" is not limited by physical as trying to maintain independent dependency chains (e.g. a durable storage provider may decide to cut off account access so maybe a second independent storage provider using a different credit card makes sense)
Your OCD may also be helped a bit by having some way to verify you backups (e.g. use ZFS and scrub regularly and/or separate hash manifests of the files).
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#89They cannot scan zipped files with a password. Problem solved. Unless they ban zipped files with a password.
Re: Google Drive could soon start locking your files
#90I will never forget that the Christchurch shooting video was automatically deleted from users' PRIVATE Google Drive and Dropbox - no warnings were given and no explanation was presented.
Perhaps I'm sensitive as a NZer, but would you feel the same if the deleted document was a plan for a nuclear weapon etc? Though while giving a warning is clearly inappropriate, they should certainly have explained what they did.
In this case, people could have had the video because they agreed with the shooter, to using it to show people how horrible terror really is.
Regardless, I fully support peoples right to have videos of terrible events.