It's concerning how many self-labelled software engineers on Twitter are chipping in with comments like "it's open source so it's fair game" or "they just need to add attribution".
It's reminiscent of people adding "no copyright intended" (sic) when posting other people's music online. It seems like intuitions about copyright have been shifting, even if the law hasn't.
TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
171–180 of 543 posts
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I honestly think Washington doesn't exercise similar influence over Google or other American companies. CNN likes to pop up a PIP view of what's being broadcast in China when they talk about things that embarrass the Chinese government. When they start talking about Peng Shuai it takes about two seconds before the Chinese broadcast becomes a test pattern. When's the last time you saw a test pattern when watching…
If you want to uncritically believe everything US establishment media says about enemies of the US establishment, that is your problem.
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#173Could someone please help explain to me and (others who might not know) what is the concrete problem caused by this forking that doesn't comply with the license?
There are acceptable ways to bundle GPL code with closed source software in a single distributable, however it must be made clear which parts of the distribution are licensed under the GPL and the GPL license must be clearly present. Even in the most charitable reading of the situation, TikTok violated this basic requirement.
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#174In almost all cases, TikTok's offering would be considered a derived work because you cannot swap out the OBS part for another and still have it work. So they are likely in full violation unless they agree to open source all their code. Seems like a pretty open and shut case to be honest - that is, if they intend to pursue legal action and the powers that be rule appropriately.
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#175I'd like to see HN shy away from posting twitter threads as news. There's almost always a hard link to the source material, and twitter threads are filled with emotional, truncated, nuance-lacking, trite clips that more often than not do little to promote healthy discussion of a topic. The goal of quality here really is noble.
One of my most recent grievances is with HN is the ranking penalty of Twitter submissions as that has been the primary source of news lately, for better or for worse.
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#176It's concerning how many self-labelled software engineers on Twitter are chipping in with comments like "it's open source so it's fair game" or "they just need to add attribution".
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to uncritically believe everything US establishment media says about enemies of the US establishment, that is your problem.
Where did I say that? Keep in mind that I'm not saying the US government has no influence, but it isn't anywhere close to what the situation in China is.
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Paying for a license would be nearly impossible, as the OBS team would need every contributor to sign a CLA to give the OBS team the rights to relicense/dual-license the OBS code base.
Would be nice if the contributors could get some money for it
Re: TikTok streaming software is an illegal fork of OBS
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes Twitter any different in reliability than someone's blog? HN is filled with random blog links
The obvious difference is that it's impossible to explain any complex or in depth information using 280 characters or less. Trying to follow a thread of tweets (without using a 3rd party site) is painful. Heck, this throwaway response barely fits.