Live data from Hacker News

Design evolution of the Windows control panel

versionmuseum.com

11–20 of 112 posts

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#11
post #2

Windows 2000 was clearly the peak in this article, and (as a whole system) it did feel like it at the time. (I do wish it had included ClearType though...)

Same here. One thing I also felt about Windows 2000 is that it was designed for professionals. Windows XP, in my mind, made compromises to appeal to a wider swath of consumers.

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#12
post #8

Classic view with classic icon arrangement is still the easiest to find things. Mostly, I guess, because the organisation of things doesn't change every other version, or goes to hide under a different vaguely named subsection every so often. The fact that Updates are under Security, and not under Apps does say something about Windows, though...

Eh, updates and security go hand-in-hand. I'd say it would be best to completely split it out. Updates should just contain security update and be mandatory. Some other thing (call them upgrades) should contain new features and be optional.

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#13
post #10

Left off Windows 11. The new one is the most logical one yet. Don't like that much about Windows 11, but the control panel is improved.

Are there still two separate ones? A "modern" one and a "classic" one?

What frustrates me about Windows 10 is that each one has settings which are exclusive to it, so you always need both, and never know where to look.

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#14
post #2

Windows 2000 was clearly the peak in this article, and (as a whole system) it did feel like it at the time. (I do wish it had included ClearType though...)

While I agree, Id also argue virtually every posters opinion on HN about design of the Windows CP is useless. Most of us are power users and it we are not power users we are incredibly opinionated about some UX stuff.

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#16
post #10

Left off Windows 11. The new one is the most logical one yet. Don't like that much about Windows 11, but the control panel is improved.

Are there still two separate ones? A "modern" one and a "classic" one? What frustrates me about Windows 10 is that each one has settings which are exclusive to it, so you always need both, and never know where to look.

If there wasn't a search function, I'd absolutely never figure out where anything is in there in Windows 10. It's an absolute mess.

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#18
post #2

Windows 2000 was clearly the peak in this article, and (as a whole system) it did feel like it at the time. (I do wish it had included ClearType though...)

While I agree, Id also argue virtually every posters opinion on HN about design of the Windows CP is useless. Most of us are power users and it we are not power users we are incredibly opinionated about some UX stuff.

please exclude me from your generalisations

Re: Design evolution of the Windows control panel

#20
post #4

My first PC had Windows 3.1 and I very vividly remember the buttons, the menus, and many of the icons. In a way, they still inspire me to this day. In fact, I themed a Shoelace button based on 3.1 a few months ago. https://codepen.io/claviska/details/zYwgyEO

Nice!
Post reply on HN