What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
31–40 of 175 posts
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#32Oof. As someone who has never participated, every time a post like this shows up I'm reminded of how weird the twitterverse is. Such a microcosm of weirdness, the handles, the academic references (I don't care if you went to MIT for undergrad), the ego jockeying, the shared language of "almost-memes" like 'not all heroes wear capes', 'this is why we can't have nice things', and 'this is what peak performance is' etc…
Speaking of BNL/CERN, there is the code SixTrack which is/was used for both RHIC and LHC for collimation studies and long-term tracking. That's the worst I've ever seen. There were a few files of "normal" length but the main sixtrack source file was fifty-five thousand lines long and featured a custom-written preprocessor's directives throughout (since Fortran has no preprocessor, or for some other erason) that allow…
As ugly as things like SixTrack were, I vaguely trust them just because there were usually a lot of eyes on them... even if they were hideous. The more obscure chunks of code that were somewhere in the analysis chain were the ones that really terrified me. I worked on a lot of the code for simulating detector upgrades (I won't get more specific than that) and that was a terrifying place. Designing entire multi-billion dollar detectors systems based on hundreds of different pieces of code and output data that were glued together with no over-arching design or integration. The code 'review' usually came down to "that output looks good"... or not...
Related to this, I now work in the atmospheric sciences, and a completely-unrelated-but-oddly-similar problem exists in the various modeling communities. So many fragmented pieces of code glued together and untouched or touched with no real computing oversight. So many wasted computing cycles. So many failure points.
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#33Oof. As someone who has never participated, every time a post like this shows up I'm reminded of how weird the twitterverse is. Such a microcosm of weirdness, the handles, the academic references (I don't care if you went to MIT for undergrad), the ego jockeying, the shared language of "almost-memes" like 'not all heroes wear capes', 'this is why we can't have nice things', and 'this is what peak performance is' etc…
Our department's sysadmin was the real hero. He kept people's software running for years after they left the department. We were involved in some global-level public health data, so this wasn't trivial use-cases.
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#34Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#35Oof. As someone who has never participated, every time a post like this shows up I'm reminded of how weird the twitterverse is. Such a microcosm of weirdness, the handles, the academic references (I don't care if you went to MIT for undergrad), the ego jockeying, the shared language of "almost-memes" like 'not all heroes wear capes', 'this is why we can't have nice things', and 'this is what peak performance is' etc…
God, you are making me miss my academic days. Our department's sysadmin was the real hero. He kept people's software running for years after they left the department. We were involved in some global-level public health data, so this wasn't trivial use-cases.
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#36Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#37The tech had died several years ago and they were fully aware that when they had a problem with thsese machines that they couldn't fix, the business was done. They made parts for the fuses of artillery shells; so the actual business of their business was trivial compared to the connections and compliance paperwork, anyway.
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#38To prevent such an outage from occurring again, a yellow sticky saying "don't turn off" was attached to the AST.
Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#39Re: What’s the jankiest piece of tech you’ve seen a company depend on?
#40I worked for a company a long time ago that traded with companies all around the world. A lot of their customers were small businesses in rural Africa, South America, etc. and they in turn had local banks they used to facilitate payments to and from.
A large number of these banks did not have a reliable internet connection, or if they did, they most assuredly didn't use it for payment instructions. Instead, I had to jerry rig a system that used TELEX -- yes, TELEX -- connected to IBM's Lotus Domino/Notes suite of mail transport software. That way we could "email" domino and it'd connect to some fantastically expensive TELEX hardware which then went over the wire on whatever the hell network they'd use for that in the 2010s.
We had carefully crafted email addresses with the TELEX numbers embedded (ever wonder why email address specs are so complicated? So people like me can do dumb shit like this!)
We'd then send them very carefully formatted instructions in uppercase ascii, to conform with (I forget which, SWIFT perhaps?) payment instructions that were clearly invented in the typewriter era and then hoisted, kicking and screaming, into the digital age with nary a change.
Fun times. Worked really well and tied in with all the other stuff they'd hang off of Lotus Notes. If you ever wonder why a lot of businesses struggled to move away from it? There's your answer.