Live data from Hacker News

Reddit files to go public

reuters.com

351–360 of 834 posts

Re: Reddit files to go public

#351
post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The fact that old.reddit.com continues to be available suggests that they did.

To this point, I would probably stop using the desktop version of the site if they nixed old.reddit.com.

I’m a fan of teddit.net

Re: Reddit files to go public

#352

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's weird. I was a huge user of Reddit from its launch to 2013 when I fell off the Internet. I didn't use it again until 2021, so I had a big jump in UI. As a UX designer I really don't get all the hate about the current interface. It works great for me.

Just curious, did you abstain from the internet for 8 years? Or just Reddit?

Jail.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#353

The Reddit of 2006 where tutorials on generating HTML in Lisp rocket to the top of the homepage is long gone. I can't imagine investing in an ad company that is fueled by clickbait and outrage the way Reddit is. Plus, some percentage of the userbase will always run aggressive ad blockers and be impossible to effectvely monetize. However, my brain works very differently from other people's, so I could be wrong.

If i was chosing something to invest in (as opposed to read) i would definitely pick clickbait memes over lisp tutorials.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah while all the big subreddits are nigh unusable, there's a lot of small/mid-sized communities that are an absolute delight to be a part of.

This is a moral conundrum. Yes, some of the smaller sub-reddits are good, but by participating, you legitimize the conflict/fakenews/horrorshow that is the main website. It's like saying you enjoy the trains running on time in Nazi Germany whilst ignoring the rest of what the regime is.

It was Italy that got trains running on time. Get your fascist regimes straight.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Taking shots at the engineers is too far. Reddit is about a million times more stable than it used to be a few years ago. Also I don’t think Reddit or the Internet needs “saving”. They’re both more successful than ever by any common metric whether we like the direction they’re going or not.

I have a 10-year-old reddit account. When it was static pages served out of lisp, it was rock-solid. Their rewrite got to the instability you're describing, and it never really recovered.

The Python rewrite happened 16 years ago. 10 years ago, there was probably an order of magnitude (or more!) less traffic and this is probably what causes most of their instability.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#356
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

* keep the old.Reddit.com design for everyone * spend 9 figures for a redesign The choice was obvious

I don't think a lot Gen Z don't like the old.reddit.com because it looks kind of old fashioned vs say react "modern" pages and they're afraid of lookign old-fashioned. However, that is what keeps me coming back along with relative anonymity and content on topics that I like.

Late Zoomers I think you're correct, however my early Zoomer friends and I all use old reddit - we grew up with it after all.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's weird. I was a huge user of Reddit from its launch to 2013 when I fell off the Internet. I didn't use it again until 2021, so I had a big jump in UI. As a UX designer I really don't get all the hate about the current interface. It works great for me.

It's literally 10x slower on all devices that I have, shows less content (particularly, long comment threads), and 100 other reasons they I'd sure hope you understood as a UX designer. It's 2021, I don't want to see a "Loading..." icon like I'm on dial-up in the 90s. Compare with https://old.reddit.com — open them side by side, refresh, click around. We can have a serious discussion about what sucks in the "new" UI,…

Honestly, I have seen no performance issues for new Reddit on any of the devices I own. And I own some really shit devices. I'm broke, so I bought the cheapest laptop on Amazon. My phones are the lowest free Android devices.

Whereas about 80% of other sites on the Internet were unbrowseable until I installed an adblocker.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think people already don't want to admit to working there, but not for moral reasons, but for how awful the stability and product actually is. I can't say I'd blame them.

I very much doubt they do not want to admit to working on one of the world's most popular Web sites.

Perhaps. But to me it's more an anomaly that such an unreliable product can remain so popular. Can you imagine Google showing you a weird image saying you broke it multiple times a day, or youtube resembling any single thing about the video player?

Reddit has immense staying power - it is addictive. I find myself mindlessly scrolling it and putting up with most of its awfulness. But I attribute that to the users and not the product... as Digg showed, once greener pastures appear, there's not much left to brag about.

Re: Reddit files to go public

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sounds like you're mad at explicit decisions made by product owners, like the content on the frontpage or dark patterns that push mobile app usage. I guarantee none of the rank and file engineers are responsible for those decisions, and they almost certainly detest them just as much as you. The problem is if they don't implement them then they don't get a paycheck and can't put food on the table. It's silly to pai…

Your last argument can be applied to about anything regarding performing unethical tasks to stay afloat. I don’t find it convincing for engineers that work for Reddit. They can start work at any other tech company, too, so by absolving all the blame is a bit much, in the end they choose to implement it right?

I mean, sounds like you have a problem with the product managers not the engineers.
Post reply on HN