Some basic filters for stuff that pops up all the time and is never what I'm looking for: /. pinterest. \.. / /. torrent. \.. / /. spankbang. \.. / /. mp3. \.. / /. proxy. \.. / /. block. \.. / /. addiction. \.. / /. recovery. \.. / /. detox. \.. / /. clinic. \.. / /. rehab. \.. / /. rarbg. \.. / /. hydra. \.. / /. 123. \.. / /. stock. \.. / /. linkedin. \.. / /. subtitle. \.. / /. shopify. \.. / /. dreamstime. \.. /…
Ah yes the notoriously spammy .dev TLD. I guarantee you that .com, .net, and .org have far more spam and low quality sites than this stupid list.
uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
171–180 of 317 posts
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
They mean no way to have a persistent black list you don’t have to set every search.
Couldn't you do this with Chrome search engines? https://zapier.com/blog/add-search-engine-to-chrome/
If you take 102 site blocklist from a top comment and turn it into a site exclusion search like this:
-site:code-examples.net -site:kotaeta.com -site:answer-id.com -site:code.i-harness.com -site:living-sun.com -site:qastack.jp -site:qastack.ru -site:qastack.it -site:qastack.mx -site:qastack.com.br -site:qastack.info.tr -site:qastack.in.th -site:qastack.com.de -site:qastack.fr -site:qastack.cn -site:qastack.com.ua -site:qastack.co.in -site:qastack.kr -site:qastack.vn -site:qastack.net.bd -site:qa-stack.pl -site:qastack.id -site:www.coder.work -site:www.it-swarm-ja.tech -site:www.it-swarm.jp.net -site:www.it-mure.jp.net -site:www.it-swarm-ja.com -site:www.it-swarm.com.ru -site:codeflow.site -site:codeguides.site -site:overcoder.net -site:coderoad.ru -site:www.generacodice.blog -site:www.generacodice.it -site:www.generacodice.com -site:www.javaer101.com -site:voidcc.com -site:siwib.org ...
And then try adding that to a Google query you see this warning message on Google:> ".... (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 32 words"
If you try it on duckduckgo you just get an error page.
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extend this to map search - If only I could exclude all starbucks, 7/11, even Denny's from my map searches for 'coffee shop'. No hate to those who like the coffee from there, but I want a proper coffee shop and if I could filter out certain chains, I would do it in a caffeinated heartbeat. This applies to not just Google maps though.
At least you can -exclude those names. Gas station convenience stores come up for "grocery store" searches, yet they're all named differently.
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#174Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#175As others have said, it can also be done with a uBlock filter. For example, here are my filters that block and remove terrible copycats/translations of StackOverflow https://gist.github.com/quenhus/6bd2c47e5780f726f0c96c0a2ee7... . I hate these copies that somehow manage to be better referenced than StackOverflow.
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Every time I accidentally click a Quora search result it makes me so unhappy. I must have missed the memo about Pinterest though. I always liked that site but haven't been on there in a while. I'm reading up on what's wrong and it sounds like a few years ago it started drowning in ads. Then this year they pushed an update that caused half their users to stop using the platform. Is that accurate?
What's wrong with Quora? Now I don't use Quora for any serious source of information, but it's just a site with lots of fun anecdotes. Reading these anecdotes isn't a bad way to pass the time; it's IMO much better than mindlessly watching videos on Instagram or TikTok (which I don't do at all).
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#177Too late to change name to "ublocklist"?
Non-creative name: "SearchDenylist" Reasons: * I think of the "u" prefix in this narrow technology niche (browser-based filtering) as almost a trademark of the great project now called "uBlock Origin". * "Blacklist" isn't a term to be making new uses of in the US. (Given ongoing history of racial injustices, and how the terms "blacklist" and "whitelist" have been used in our field to designate "bad" and "good", respe…
Is your viewpoint that "blacklist" is a racial term in itself, i.e. is used in a racial sense? I've never seen that, and my understanding is that's not the case historically, but call me out if I'm wrong and that's your point.
Based on your comments on disregarding etymology, my understanding is that you're not making the first point. I'm reading your viewpoint more as: "we shouldn't use 'black' as an abstract connotation for 'bad' meanings in words", (presumably due to 'black' being also associated with a group that has a history of racially-motivated prejudice against it, but let me know if this last part is wrong).
I'm also curious if your view is that no colors that have historically described groups should be used as negative descriptors, or is this specific to black people in English? For instance, is your view that phrases like "white bread" to describe boring people, or "brown noser" to describe suck-ups should go away as well?
Additionally, should abstract phrases/words involving the term "black" should be done away with entirely, or that only ones with negative connotations should be avoided? For instance, is it okay for "black ties" to associate "black" with formality, or for "in the black" to be used for businesses that are very successful?
I think I disagree that "blacklist" needs to be associated with black people any more than "white noise" noise needs to be associated with white people. The color black has a long association with a variety of different things, from death ("Black plague") to authority ("Black Rod"), from luxury ("Black Card") to villainy ("Black Hat").
One of the many associations of "black" is with a particular racial group, but that doesn't mean we have to attribute all the associations of that word with that racial group.
It seems to me that if the word itself has no history of racial origin, isn't used today in scenarios of racial prejudice, and the association is not related to a racial group, it seems unnecessary to avoid it.
Like I said, though, I'd definitely love to get a different perspective here.
Re: uBlacklist: Blocks specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#178As others have said, it can also be done with a uBlock filter. For example, here are my filters that block and remove terrible copycats/translations of StackOverflow https://gist.github.com/quenhus/6bd2c47e5780f726f0c96c0a2ee7... . I hate these copies that somehow manage to be better referenced than StackOverflow.
This is amazing. I tried extending this to remove all pinterest results too (the real cancer of the internet) but the filter doesn't seem to be working.. Any tips? google.*##.g:has(a[href*="pinterest.*"])
google.*##.g:has(a[href*=".pinterest.*"])
google.*##a[href*=".pinterest."]:upward(1)