Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those of us who are running profitable bootstrapped companies tend to put less effort into getting our name in the tech or business press. It is more important that we get our name into the minds of our customers, as our cash flow does not come from Sand Hill Road. So, this lack of coverage should come as no surprise.
That's something I've been wrestling with lately. LiberWriter has started to turn a profit, and I'm wondering if I should copy Balsamiq's transparency / blog posts about early success. In some ways I'd like to, because publicity should help a bit in any case, but getting on HN really isn't going to get us any new customers.
Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
21–30 of 69 posts
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#22I love the story behind GitHub, they managed to live to a few bucks, and with patience all their effort is paying themselves, not having to share their effort with others.
Congratulations to those guys behind those Bootstrapped Startups.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#23You can see a list of interviewed companies at: http://37signals.com/bootstrapped
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#24Some of you might already know about this, but 37Signals produces a series called Bootstrapped, Profitable & Proud where they interview bootstrapped companies with more than 1M in revenues. You can see a list of interviewed companies at: http://37signals.com/bootstrapped
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#25Some of you might already know about this, but 37Signals produces a series called Bootstrapped, Profitable & Proud where they interview bootstrapped companies with more than 1M in revenues. You can see a list of interviewed companies at: http://37signals.com/bootstrapped
I really enjoy this series and they do a good job of writing about the companies. However, I don't think it's fair to call companies that took an angel investment as being "bootstrapped." What does the rest of HN think? Is that being pedantic? Please share your thoughts.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#26half of them I never even heard of...just goes to show the lack of coverage for self funded companies
Those of us who are running profitable bootstrapped companies tend to put less effort into getting our name in the tech or business press. It is more important that we get our name into the minds of our customers, as our cash flow does not come from Sand Hill Road. So, this lack of coverage should come as no surprise.
If HN users aren't your customer base, then coverage in TC or HN frontpage will do nothing for you. It may stroke your ego, but it won't pad your pocketbook.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#27Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's something I've been wrestling with lately. LiberWriter has started to turn a profit, and I'm wondering if I should copy Balsamiq's transparency / blog posts about early success. In some ways I'd like to, because publicity should help a bit in any case, but getting on HN really isn't going to get us any new customers.
I would say don't do it. I'm in a similar position (profitable company with an interesting back-story) and it seems like a bad idea to start giving out your personal financial details to the world.
Re: Highly Successful Bootstrapped Startups
#29half of them I never even heard of...just goes to show the lack of coverage for self funded companies
Right but in many cases the companies don't really want to share their revenue numbers. It's sort of saying to people who would like to compete here is how little it cost to build, how much people have been willing to pay, and how big of a win starting this business would be. I don't really see myself talking about revenue numbers for my company. Not sure how I benefit from it besides the ego and status boost which i…