Live data from Hacker News

Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

latimes.com

101–110 of 163 posts

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#101
post #70
post #57

Actual user of the beta here. Happy to answer any questions that are honest. My opinion is let the technology develop in the open, warts and all.

My delivery isn’t until June but I’ve held off on buying FSD (maybe I’ll enable it for the month when I do a long trip), but I’m worried about this fantom braking issue I’ve heard about.

You will have basic autopilot which can also phantom brake. It is not as bad as it seems and was possibly worse when they used radar. As long as you are attentive to the system it is not a big deal.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#102
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My delivery isn’t until June but I’ve held off on buying FSD (maybe I’ll enable it for the month when I do a long trip), but I’m worried about this fantom braking issue I’ve heard about.

I would get an older one. Newer ones lack the expensive radar component. Camera-only can be disabled by kids with a Q-beam (bright flashlight).

On the contrary phantom braking for me was almost always caused by the radars and especially with overpasses in front of you.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#103
post #91
post #57

Actual user of the beta here. Happy to answer any questions that are honest. My opinion is let the technology develop in the open, warts and all.

As someone who shares a road with Teslas, it feels like I have been enrolled in this beta without my consent, and without any tangible benefits to me. What are the arguments for why non-owners should support this approach?

As someone who shares (reality) with (people), it feels like I have been enrolled in this beta (consisting of taking photos, video recording, coughing, driving) without my consent, and without any tangible benefits to me.

What are the arguments for why non-owners should support this approach?

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#104
post #95
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Help me understand how you think your opinion entitles you to gamble with other people's lives.

Because I don’t view it that way as an actual user of the system. I know I am still in full control of the vehicle as is any driver using it. Merely tapping the brakes is hardwired to return control to the driver. The system also has many controls to montior driver attentivness and alert or disable itself if the driver is not attentive. Recently folks have been kicked out of the beta program for lots of reasons so th…

Just because you can make steering, braking, and acceleration changes to the car does not mean you are “in control”. The software makes such aggressive decisions that it can become impossible to react, causing massive additional danger to others, such as was the case in the recent crash.

https://twitter.com/mostlyharmlessz/status/14694217625553510...

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#105
post #57

Actual user of the beta here. Happy to answer any questions that are honest. My opinion is let the technology develop in the open, warts and all.

Does it work?

It does work quite well already and each release is getting better. I’ve done several city drives with zero interventions. As long as you are attentive it is very safe.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#106
post #95
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Help me understand how you think your opinion entitles you to gamble with other people's lives.

Because I don’t view it that way as an actual user of the system. I know I am still in full control of the vehicle as is any driver using it. Merely tapping the brakes is hardwired to return control to the driver. The system also has many controls to montior driver attentivness and alert or disable itself if the driver is not attentive. Recently folks have been kicked out of the beta program for lots of reasons so th…

I see the argument, but I don't think driver control/supervision is actually the crux of the issue. If Firestone had a completely new tire technology that was mostly ok but had an elevated risk of spontaneously blowing out, I would not be happy if they were doing their beta testing in public roads regardless of who was driving.

The technology being tested seems half baked and not yet ready for testing on a public roads. At the very least, their approach to software updates does not seem like its being sufficiently tested before deployment. This video[1] linked in another thread is an example of what I mean.

[1] https://twitter.com/mostlyharmlessz/status/14694217625553510...

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#107

Slightly off topic, but it's fun to see company culture reflected in the algorithm behaviour. There are thousands of clips of Tesla's Fatal Self Driving being far too aggressive for American roads ( https://nitter.net/taylorogan/status/1469404579439824899 ). Meanwhile, companies like AutoX have the problem of being far too conservative for Asian roads ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=TFEvkmvIjVo ). AutoX…

This I've long thought the be the Achilles' heel of autonomous. Even skilled human drivers have a hard time calibrating their style to the local situation. I remember the first time I drove as a passenger through Manhattan with my father driving, and couldn't get my head around his change in driving style. Was a side of him I'd never seen before - driving aggressively like a cab driver. I'm sure it came from his year…

Learning the appropriate driving style for a neighborhood / city seems like one of the easier AI problems for Tesla to solve.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#108
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As someone who shares a road with Teslas, it feels like I have been enrolled in this beta without my consent, and without any tangible benefits to me. What are the arguments for why non-owners should support this approach?

As someone who shares (reality) with (people), it feels like I have been enrolled in this beta (consisting of taking photos, video recording, coughing, driving) without my consent, and without any tangible benefits to me. What are the arguments for why non-owners should support this approach?

I actually have no idea what point you are trying to make, assuming there was one.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#109
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because I don’t view it that way as an actual user of the system. I know I am still in full control of the vehicle as is any driver using it. Merely tapping the brakes is hardwired to return control to the driver. The system also has many controls to montior driver attentivness and alert or disable itself if the driver is not attentive. Recently folks have been kicked out of the beta program for lots of reasons so th…

Just because you can make steering, braking, and acceleration changes to the car does not mean you are “in control”. The software makes such aggressive decisions that it can become impossible to react, causing massive additional danger to others, such as was the case in the recent crash. https://twitter.com/mostlyharmlessz/status/14694217625553510...

I don’t know the specifics of that incident but it should be exceedingly rare. I would like to know more about it and will try to find out more.

Re: Alarmed by Tesla’s self-driving test, state legislators demand answers from DMV

#110

I really thought the breaks would have been slammed on Tesla's shipping of autonomous car software after the incident where the guy was decapitated by a tractor trailer.

The question is whether overall the technology makes Tesla drivers more safe. They’ve shown data that drivers with the autopilot features enabled are safer than those who do not have it on.

While you can dispute the data, it’s not as simple as “car makes one type of mistake”, “feature should be banned”.

Post reply on HN