This website has 81% battery power remaining
solar.lowtechmagazine.com
This website has 81% battery power remaining
1–10 of 365 posts
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#2It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle.
It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#3It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle. It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
One can only blame HN traffic for its sudden decrease.
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#4It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle. It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
It’s on the HN front page, I don’t think I’d extrapolate anything from its current power usage.
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#5It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle. It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
[deleted]
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#6It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle. It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
It’s on the HN front page, I don’t think I’d extrapolate anything from its current power usage.
Ha. We better read it while we can!
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#7They haven't yet responded, but I wonder if it would make any difference in power consumption (CPU usage, to be more specific) if redbean[1][2] could be used instead of nginx.
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#8It’s at 76% now. In 53 minutes since the post it has gone down 4%. So say roughly 5% per hour as a back of the envelop calculation. That’s roughly 20 hours on a full charged cycle. It would be good to know if there is a fast charge capability of the battery and how long would that be. An hour of full sun a day? Or two hours of partial sun?
One can only blame HN traffic for its sudden decrease.
Well the sun has probably set in Barcelona too, this won't help either.
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#9Ironic that the content is solely about the server itself. It's a bit like a blog about the libraries and tools used to make the blog.
Re: This website has 81% battery power remaining
#10> This was caused by a software upgrade of the Linux kernel, which increased the average power use of the server from 1.19 to 1.49 watts
I wonder what change in the linux kernel caused the increased load. Someone out there is responsible for this crime!