Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Prevayler: ACID persistence for plain old Java objects (2013)

prevayler.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: Prevayler: ACID persistence for plain old Java objects (2013)

#11

Post by pphysch »

unclebucknasty wrote: post #10
pphysch wrote: post #8

I recently implemented something like this in Go, basically just a tiny bit of glue between encoding/json and pgx (for JSONB columns). With generics, it's trivial to wrap any Go struct into an ACID record. Quite nice for rapid development without getting buried by ORMs or NoSQL, and it becomes easy to migrate the "soft" JSONB columns to "hard" DDL schemas as performance requires it.

> migrate the "soft" JSONB columns to "hard" DDL schemas as performance requires Are there cases wherein GIN indexes on the JSONB columns aren't sufficient for performance requirements?

I assume so but not sure. I'm also keeping the ACID wrapper as simple as possible and not trying to implement e.g. joins, with the idea that highly relational data should be "hardened" anyways into proper (de)normalized DDL.

It is really easy to implement indexes and multi-column unique constraints generically over JSONB (in the Go wrapper), which is nice.

Re: Prevayler: ACID persistence for plain old Java objects (2013)

#12

Post by Scubabear68 »

I remember the crazy hype they had around this when it was introduced over a decade ago. All the bizarre claims comparing it to being “a million times faster than RDBMS databases” when in fact it was just in-memory objects that were periodically written out with stream.writeObject().

Re: Prevayler: ACID persistence for plain old Java objects (2013)

#13

Post by testplzignore »

bmc7505 wrote: post #7

Looks like it uses Log4j: https://github.com/prevayler/prevayler/blob/f52736da5a2d7d87...

Heh, good spot. Funny enough, it was upgraded to log4j2 somewhat recently in https://github.com/prevayler/prevayler/issues/24 to remediate CVE-2019-17571, which it probably wasn't even vulnerable to. I wonder how many other people did the same thing. I wish security advisories did a better job explaining the circumstances of when something is exploitable.

Re: Prevayler: ACID persistence for plain old Java objects (2013)

#14

Post by michael1999 »

geodel wrote: post #6

When I read "Version 2.6 was released on 2013-01-15" I am not sure if there is enough wood behind Prevlayer arrow. If one does need Java object persistence perhaps this seems better maintained [1] 1. https://microstream.one/

I wouldn’t be put off. The core idea is simple enough it is basically done. There are better reasons to avoid it, like the existence of SQLite.
Post reply on HN