31–40 of 193 posts
The value of cryptocurrency is 0.
Not to someone who has had civil asset forfeiture experience.
The problem comes when people mistake one for another.
IOW, buying a bunch of screwdrivers isn't a great retirement strategy.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know if you’re serious. Your username does check out at least. I also believe crypto itself is worthless. Only the networks behind them and actually providing a service (transaction validation) have some value. The question is: can the networks survive a crypto crash. How do you pay miners with near zero value crypto? I can see a (sad) future where we will be left with central bank digital currencies only (CB…
There's a difference between utility and value. Plastic forks, knives, and spoons have high utility (in that they help us to eat). They have very little value, and can be purchased at any dollar store. So the blockchain doesn't have intrinsic value because the crypto currency doesn't have intrinsic value. Utility, for many use cases, it does have.
Crypto is worthless. All the VCs pouring money into crypto/web3 (a16h, sequoia) are worthless. All the companies pivoting to web3 are worthless (square). All the companies building up web3 teams are worthless (stripe, mastercard). All the fastest growing startups (coinbase, ftx, opensea) are worthless. All the devs who get started in crypto/web3 and won't go back, are worthless.
I don’t know if you’re serious. Your username does check out at least. I also believe crypto itself is worthless. Only the networks behind them and actually providing a service (transaction validation) have some value. The question is: can the networks survive a crypto crash. How do you pay miners with near zero value crypto? I can see a (sad) future where we will be left with central bank digital currencies only (CB…
In real terms it’s worth whatever the next buyer is willing to pay. It annoys me that people cite the run-up over the last decade as evidence of it’s brilliance when it’s nothing of the sort, but I’d just sound like a loon screaming into the wind.
Personally I think it’s worthless. Honestly I suspect Satoshi Nakamoto (if they’re still alive) probably thinks the same; One of the later posts Satoshi made before disappearing was making the point that if it accrued any value at all then it would be useable to transact and therefore viable.
The problem is that if that’s true of Bitcoin, it’s also true of all tokens, meaning the scarcity argument is entirely imaginary - if one token is perceived as too expensive then the perception of value will shift to another that’s viewed as ”cheaper” (and thus more likely to “mooon!”), meaning the supply of tokens taken as a whole is actually infinite and arbitrary, rather than scarce, and the value of the cryptocurrency market as a whole is therefore infinitely and arbitrarily small per unit (i.e. worthless).
But what do I know? I’m just some loon screaming into the wind.
Crypto is worthless. All the VCs pouring money into crypto/web3 (a16h, sequoia) are worthless. All the companies pivoting to web3 are worthless (square). All the companies building up web3 teams are worthless (stripe, mastercard). All the fastest growing startups (coinbase, ftx, opensea) are worthless. All the devs who get started in crypto/web3 and won't go back, are worthless.
I don’t know if you’re serious. Your username does check out at least. I also believe crypto itself is worthless. Only the networks behind them and actually providing a service (transaction validation) have some value. The question is: can the networks survive a crypto crash. How do you pay miners with near zero value crypto? I can see a (sad) future where we will be left with central bank digital currencies only (CB…
Consider the oracle problem, the fact that running Hello World requires mining a block, that software contains errors and cannot be patched on the blockchain, the curious absence of real world applications of blockchain after all those years, and the inevitable precedence of the Law in the real world that makes any "the code is the law" ideas moot...
A complicated, hard to understand scheme like blockchain is just the right thing to keep the crypto hype going and to attract more of that money that is looking for investment opportunities in this world of overvalued assets and low-interest rates.
Does that shift seem recognisable to others? If correct, what's the drastic change driven from?
Edit: spelling
Bitcoin is massively, overwhelmingly manipulated by a very small number of actors. The price is a complete fantasy, and exists mostly to transfer money from new investors to those manipulators, and bitcoin miners. There is a lot of money going in. There will not be a lot of money coming out. The money is gone.
Crypto is worthless. All the VCs pouring money into crypto/web3 (a16h, sequoia) are worthless. All the companies pivoting to web3 are worthless (square). All the companies building up web3 teams are worthless (stripe, mastercard). All the fastest growing startups (coinbase, ftx, opensea) are worthless. All the devs who get started in crypto/web3 and won't go back, are worthless.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a difference between utility and value. Plastic forks, knives, and spoons have high utility (in that they help us to eat). They have very little value, and can be purchased at any dollar store. So the blockchain doesn't have intrinsic value because the crypto currency doesn't have intrinsic value. Utility, for many use cases, it does have.
crypto is like the spork
Crypto is worthless. All the VCs pouring money into crypto/web3 (a16h, sequoia) are worthless. All the companies pivoting to web3 are worthless (square). All the companies building up web3 teams are worthless (stripe, mastercard). All the fastest growing startups (coinbase, ftx, opensea) are worthless. All the devs who get started in crypto/web3 and won't go back, are worthless.
I don’t know if you’re serious. Your username does check out at least. I also believe crypto itself is worthless. Only the networks behind them and actually providing a service (transaction validation) have some value. The question is: can the networks survive a crypto crash. How do you pay miners with near zero value crypto? I can see a (sad) future where we will be left with central bank digital currencies only (CB…
If the value goes down the network decreases difficulty of mining so it is cheaper to mine (remember these things started being worth nothing). This also decreases economic security though, we should find some combination of what security is adequate and that will be represented in the tokens.
Let’s not end up in that sad authoritarian cbdc future, instead we can build and adopt global foss systems like the ones we’ve been building the past decade. Or we could ignore it all, call it a scam, and let it be captured by VCs and governments.