There's more on Mount Athos on a website devoted to Fermor: [2]
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/books/review/patrick-leig... (Archived: https://archive.ph/uAM3B )
[2] https://patrickleighfermor.org/2011/04/30/mount-athos-a-visi...
151–160 of 173 posts
There's more on Mount Athos on a website devoted to Fermor: [2]
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/09/books/review/patrick-leig... (Archived: https://archive.ph/uAM3B )
[2] https://patrickleighfermor.org/2011/04/30/mount-athos-a-visi...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being better aligned with astronomical events makes it more correct. The purpose of the calendar is to map the year, the orbit of the Earth around the Sun. The drift in the Julian calendar was not intended. It is a flaw.
What about the drift in the Gregorian calendar? Solar day and tropical year do not have a least common multiple. Earth's rotation is — arguably — better measured against the stars, so a sidereal day is more "correct", yet it would not map to our daily routine at all. So I believe the question is not what is more "correct" (we've long established that we are dealing with approximations at best, Julian calendar include…
BTW Greece moving into the EU meant they had to get a special ratified status to keep blocking women access (that would be illegal otherwise) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=15779940...
Which I'm not a fan of, but then again I'm not a fan of the church owning an entire peninsula.
The Greek Constitution begins with “In the name of the Holy and Consubstantial and Indivisible Trinity.”
If the EU is going to take counties as they are … this is how Greece is - a state with a very influential established church.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about the drift in the Gregorian calendar? Solar day and tropical year do not have a least common multiple. Earth's rotation is — arguably — better measured against the stars, so a sidereal day is more "correct", yet it would not map to our daily routine at all. So I believe the question is not what is more "correct" (we've long established that we are dealing with approximations at best, Julian calendar include…
I mean the answer is pretty simple: Neither is perfect, but the Gregorian calendar is objectively more correct. It has a small amount of drift, but the drift is less than the Julian calendar. This also makes it more useful, because it will be able to predict solstices and equinoxes (and other dates needed for scheduling planting and harvesting of crops) more accurately than the Julian calendar. Its overwhelming domin…
You also seem to be overstating the importance of exact dates when it comes to agriculture: my experience is that +-13 days does not make a practical difference, especially if it slowly accumulates (it's not like you would suddenly have to do the harvest 13 days later from one year to the next — you actuslly had to do it 10-13 days "early" once the calendar was switched, and it didn't make a difference even then).
If human civilization continued using the Julian calendar, we wouldn't have been any worse off: nothing points at it that we would have been. I am not saying that Gregorian calendar is "worse" at all (though those born on Feb 29 might beg to disagree when they go 8 years between birthdays 2096-2104 :)), just that where it's better does not matter much.
BTW Greece moving into the EU meant they had to get a special ratified status to keep blocking women access (that would be illegal otherwise) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=15779940...
Which I'm not a fan of, but then again I'm not a fan of the church owning an entire peninsula.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> have no base whatsoever Gender segregated monasteries have existed since foreveer. Mt Athos is like one giant monastery in that sense. For religious people there is a base for gender segregation.
No problem with monasteries and gender restrictions of religions, but here we’re talking about a huge area (a peninsula)! We have similar restrictions for women in churches located in cities and these are generally accepted and followed, but only on “holly” grounds and not for large areas like Mt Athos.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're a victim of the biases and presumptions of your own egalitarian culture. There is a basis. Men and women are different and sexually complementary. One obvious reason is that the sexual tension and constant presence of people of the opposite sex (female orders exclude men also) and subsequent temptation and stirred concupiscence can be a distraction to the spiritual life. But the tendency for sex segregation oc…
The concept that sexual tension/activity and a spiritual life are at odds or mutually exclusive is itself a bias and presumption.
As for every spiritual/faith decision you are free to think otherwise, but calling it a bias seems very ungenerous.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are these "restrictions that have no base whatsoever"? Are you referring to "Christian men only"? Surely you can see the basis of a male monastery complex only allowing male Christian guests? Would you be equally upset at a Buddhist convent only allowing Buddhist women as guests?
No, the problem is not with the rules of the monasteries, but with the rules of our religion against women. There are no Greek Orthodox women priests, despite the fact that we have many women Saints! And just to be clear, I’m against all religions that are discriminating people and putting them into groups.
Becoming a priest is not something you do for your own good, it's not a privilege, it's a calling. Priests exist for the good of society, not for priests themselves, you are viewing things backwards.