Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to other tweets: the export does not include Direct Messages which is what some companies use (almost) exclusively, meaning they cannot export 99% of their content. https://twitter.com/rdjpalmer/status/1468526843129208834
This isn't possible on slack either. We lost messages from even private channels, let alone direct messages when we migrated
Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
21–30 of 36 posts
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
A contract’s a contract and if they agree to something, it’s enforceable. For example — it’s not uncommon when adopting a dog to sign a contract agreeing you will walk it N times a week, or never leave it unattended in public, etc.
Yeah but who would enforce a contract in such a case? The previous owners, working now at Twitter?
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to other tweets: the export does not include Direct Messages which is what some companies use (almost) exclusively, meaning they cannot export 99% of their content. https://twitter.com/rdjpalmer/status/1468526843129208834
I think this is a pragmatic decision. Direct messages are somewhat private (though I do understand that is not always the case with companies). It seems to me to be a privacy / security thing. I am not aware of any companies who solely use DMs, I am sure they exist. But the point of Quill was to not lock up information in DMs and to better organize channels. I would think users of Quill most likely did not solely use…
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#24Quill users leaving Twitter with others following suit - largest loss in active users in the history of the service, loss of network effect spells disaster for the bird's future
Alas, the sheep remain docile as long as they get their daily servings of outrage-in-200-characters-or-less.
Why does anyone use Twitter? What is the appeal, other than the named outrage factor? As far as I can see it is the modern equivalent of the stockade where the populace gets to throw rotten tomatoes against heretics and dissenters, patting each other on the back for their perceived loyalty to The Cause™. Just ditch the damn bird, that thing don't fly.
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#25Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is a pragmatic decision. Direct messages are somewhat private (though I do understand that is not always the case with companies). It seems to me to be a privacy / security thing. I am not aware of any companies who solely use DMs, I am sure they exist. But the point of Quill was to not lock up information in DMs and to better organize channels. I would think users of Quill most likely did not solely use…
Companies with data retention requirements might be legally obligated to keep those DMs, and I don’t see how Quill would be unaware of that. Either they’re confident that none of their clients have such a need or they decided that it would be too hard to export DMs with 4 days notice and said “meh.”
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
According to other tweets: the export does not include Direct Messages which is what some companies use (almost) exclusively, meaning they cannot export 99% of their content. https://twitter.com/rdjpalmer/status/1468526843129208834
This isn't possible on slack either. We lost messages from even private channels, let alone direct messages when we migrated
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#28Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Companies with data retention requirements might be legally obligated to keep those DMs, and I don’t see how Quill would be unaware of that. Either they’re confident that none of their clients have such a need or they decided that it would be too hard to export DMs with 4 days notice and said “meh.”
If they are legally required for data retention why did they use this product in the first place?
1. Departments/divisions have their own budgets; Quill was purchased before security or compliance was involved.
2. Quill was deployed or piloted for a group without retention requirements then escaped into the wild. Security or compliance wasn't involved until it was in use company wide.
3. A client required using Quill so the usual compliance requirements were waived.
Re: Twitter shutting down acquired service Quill with 4 day notice and no DM export
#30Maybe twitter will be able to provide a week's notice by 2024-25