Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#2Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#3-> Suppose you could buy a share of Tesla Inc. and send it to a friend in Shanghai as easily as sending an email. Or imagine placing a bet on the inflation rate at the end of President Joe Biden’s term, which would pay off in bitcoin if you were right.
Couldn’t we already do this with traditional technology? Why on earth would this have to be on a blockchain to work?
The reason we can’t do this currently is due to laws & regulations (which developed over decades to mollify various issues that arose in markets) - not because of the tech.
It seems that blockchain in this sense is simply trying to erase decades of laws and regulations and paint itself as “different”. Solving human issues (eg laws), requires human solutions, not pseudo-technological ideas.
Unless I’m mistaken, I’m always open to hearing the opposing viewpoint on why it’s necessary to use blockchain for this and impossible to use current technology. I just don’t seem to see why
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#4Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#5I unfortunately cannot read past the first few sentences due to the paywall, but the opening line says this: -> Suppose you could buy a share of Tesla Inc. and send it to a friend in Shanghai as easily as sending an email. Or imagine placing a bet on the inflation rate at the end of President Joe Biden’s term, which would pay off in bitcoin if you were right. Couldn’t we already do this with traditional technology? W…
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#6This is an advertisement for Pyth. The article starts off with claims that make no sense. Then instead of backing up those claims, it keeps dragging on and on hyping Pyth.
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#7This is an advertisement for Pyth. The article starts off with claims that make no sense. Then instead of backing up those claims, it keeps dragging on and on hyping Pyth.
But I do think it is artificially placed. Probably an institutional propaganda push for Pyth (or at least, that's what the supporters say it could become). Perhaps these found the right lobbyists or pockets.
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#8Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#9I unfortunately cannot read past the first few sentences due to the paywall, but the opening line says this: -> Suppose you could buy a share of Tesla Inc. and send it to a friend in Shanghai as easily as sending an email. Or imagine placing a bet on the inflation rate at the end of President Joe Biden’s term, which would pay off in bitcoin if you were right. Couldn’t we already do this with traditional technology? W…
Allowing people to bet on inflation would be complicated. You’d need to take payments, hold their money like a brokerage, and have the ability to payout. The blockchain let’s you implement such a scheme in a few lines of code. Definitely simpler to do on a blockchain.
The reality is that most crypto proponents have zero experience in capital markets and its plumbing. Your assertion that it’s simpler to do on blockchain is wrong is almost every single facet, and I’m happy to enumerate them if you’re interested.
Re: Pyth project could open up decentralized trading and lending, supporters say
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Allowing people to bet on inflation would be complicated. You’d need to take payments, hold their money like a brokerage, and have the ability to payout. The blockchain let’s you implement such a scheme in a few lines of code. Definitely simpler to do on a blockchain.
This is a completely absurd take. There are bilions of dollars of inflation trades every single day in interest rates markets. It’s enormous. The reality is that most crypto proponents have zero experience in capital markets and its plumbing. Your assertion that it’s simpler to do on blockchain is wrong is almost every single facet, and I’m happy to enumerate them if you’re interested.
All the arguments fail when you start prodding actual implementations / use cases that are used today. Outside of 3rd world countries where prepaid calling cards were a store of value not long ago, I don’t think crypto would address anything that we couldn’t do and do well today.