Live data from Hacker News

Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

economist.com

11–20 of 203 posts

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#11
A huge thanks to those who don’t hesitate and post archive.org or outline.com links to the partially readable articles.

My typical workflow on HN when I see the paid content block/popup on a destination website: 1) Go back 2) Open HN comments 3) Find archive.org or outline.com link 4) Read the content

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#12
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since when have you been waiting? What will you do in twenty years if it hasn't burst by then? And in forty? Continue to wait?

There's not a single problem it solves. A technical solution in search of a problem is a hilariously poor investment, esp when any distributed system will do the same work - but better. And all the "value" stuff on it like NFTs is just a giant ponzi scheme from any way you look at it.

buying things from nootropic websites where they won’t process credit cards

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#13
post #4

I can't wait for this bubble to burst so I never have to hear about these tulips again.

If climate change is finally taken seriously at some point, I hope they get clamped down on very hard. Unlike meth labs and "terrorists", a large mining farm can be traced by power usage. (Unless you're using solar, then go ahead and mine all you want.) Crypto fanatics are doing nothing of any practical value while greatly helping out with destroying our planet.

We've been having rolling blackouts recently because of these fuckers. Energy is cheap in my country and they use that. Power lines are not built for that sort of thing. The normal paying consumers are suffering as a result.

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#14
post #4

I can't wait for this bubble to burst so I never have to hear about these tulips again.

I guess it'll never go to zero without legislation... but the Internet's power to make communities from far-flung people mean nowadays we have a community of flat-earthers, as well as a community of rubes, and they'll continue to believe in it as it bubbles up and bursts again and again.

The number of rubes you could convince about tulips in Amsterdam was finite, but on the Internet...

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#15
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since when have you been waiting? What will you do in twenty years if it hasn't burst by then? And in forty? Continue to wait?

There's not a single problem it solves. A technical solution in search of a problem is a hilariously poor investment, esp when any distributed system will do the same work - but better. And all the "value" stuff on it like NFTs is just a giant ponzi scheme from any way you look at it.

I do think there is at least one problem that crypto currencies solve better than the status-quo: sending money internationally.

It has less regulation than the official channels. Can have better privacy. Can be cheaper. Can be faster. Compared to Western Union, international wire transfers and the likes, sending money home for foreign workers (remittance), seems to be much better with Stellar, or other low-fee crypto currencies.

Maybe one more problem that it solves: I bought some crypto early on as a hedge against global politics going to shit (US, Russia or China going into proxy wars) or economics taking a dive (and governments/central banks deciding to devaluate, ...).

I totally agree with you on NFT's though. And I don't like the speculation/gambling aspect of crypto currencies.

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#16
post #6
post #4

I can't wait for this bubble to burst so I never have to hear about these tulips again.

Since when have you been waiting? What will you do in twenty years if it hasn't burst by then? And in forty? Continue to wait?

About half as long as I've had to wait for the "NoSQL" fad to die.

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#17
post #15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's not a single problem it solves. A technical solution in search of a problem is a hilariously poor investment, esp when any distributed system will do the same work - but better. And all the "value" stuff on it like NFTs is just a giant ponzi scheme from any way you look at it.

I do think there is at least one problem that crypto currencies solve better than the status-quo: sending money internationally. It has less regulation than the official channels. Can have better privacy. Can be cheaper. Can be faster. Compared to Western Union, international wire transfers and the likes, sending money home for foreign workers (remittance), seems to be much better with Stellar, or other low-fee crypt…

Is it cheaper factoring in the cost of transferring to crypto and then back again from a currency you can actually use most places?

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#18
post #6
post #4

I can't wait for this bubble to burst so I never have to hear about these tulips again.

Since when have you been waiting? What will you do in twenty years if it hasn't burst by then? And in forty? Continue to wait?

Some bubbles last decades. Still bubbles.

Re: Crypto lobbying is going ballistic

#20
post #15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's not a single problem it solves. A technical solution in search of a problem is a hilariously poor investment, esp when any distributed system will do the same work - but better. And all the "value" stuff on it like NFTs is just a giant ponzi scheme from any way you look at it.

I do think there is at least one problem that crypto currencies solve better than the status-quo: sending money internationally. It has less regulation than the official channels. Can have better privacy. Can be cheaper. Can be faster. Compared to Western Union, international wire transfers and the likes, sending money home for foreign workers (remittance), seems to be much better with Stellar, or other low-fee crypt…

The reason it's "better" for international transfers is because it has decided to ditch all legal and financial safeguards that have been introduced, often with good reason, in regular banking. From a technical standpoint, crypto adds nothing to the process that a centralized system can't provide cheaper, faster and safer.

Additionally, a hedge is only as good as its performance in case of a worst-case scenario. If the stock market takes a dive or war breaks out, crypto will dive just as hard - same as it had done in the past.

Post reply on HN