Looks like they've acknowledged it on the status page now. https://status.aws.amazon.com/ > 8:22 AM PST We are investigating increased error rates for the AWS Management Console. > 8:26 AM PST We are experiencing API and console issues in the US-EAST-1 Region. We have identified root cause and we are actively working towards recovery. This issue is affecting the global console landing page, which is also hosted in US…
I like how 6 hours in: "Many services have already recovered".
AWS us-east-1 outage
891–900 of 1001 posts
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#892Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#893Anyone else having trouble with their Alexa devices? Mine are acting really wonky, couldn’t listen to NPR in the morning really messed up my routine.
My Alexa-controlled lights didn’t turn on this evening.
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#894"[4:35 PM PST] With the network device issues resolved, we are not working towards recovery of any impaired services. We will provide additional updates for impaired services within the appropriate entry in the Service Health Dashboard."
I guess they gave up.
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#895Earlier quoted context omitted.
This feels like a discussion that could sorely use some numbers. What are good examples of >a small business running a few websites with a few million hits per month, it might be cheaper and easier to colocate a few servers and hire a few DevOps or old-school sysadmins to administer the infrastructure. and how often do they go down?
depends I guess, I am running on-prem workstation for our DWH. So far in 2 years it went down minutes at the time, when I decided to do so, because of hardware updates. I have no idea where this narrative came from, but usually hardware you have is very reliable and doesn't turn off every 15 minutes. Heck, I use old T430 for my home server and still it doesn't go down on completely random occasions (but thats very si…
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#896Latest update: "[4:35 PM PST] With the network device issues resolved, we are not working towards recovery of any impaired services. We will provide additional updates for impaired services within the appropriate entry in the Service Health Dashboard." I guess they gave up.
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#897Earlier quoted context omitted.
Utter lies on that page. Multiple services listed as green aren't working for me or my team.
Suggesting that when the status page sends a status request and hears no response—it defaults to green—hear no evil and see no evil —> report no evil Either way—overt lies or engineering incompetence—it’s disappointing!
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#898Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was not informed of his performance reviews. However, given the reception, his work in general, and the attitudes of the team, I cannot imagine this even came up. More likely the ability to improve routing to actually make YouTube cheaper in the end was I'm sure the ultimate positive result. This was also towards the end of the golden age of Google, when the percentage of top talent was a lot higher.
So on what basis is someone's performance reviewed, if such performance is omitted?
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#899Latest update: "[4:35 PM PST] With the network device issues resolved, we are not working towards recovery of any impaired services. We will provide additional updates for impaired services within the appropriate entry in the Service Health Dashboard." I guess they gave up.
Re: AWS us-east-1 outage
#900> Firehose error: Slow down.
I wonder if they had to introduce a new exception / rate-limit to mediate this issue ...