Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 60 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#21
post #10

Pop!_OS with Pop!_OS Shell or whatever. I'm tired of fiddling with OS bits. I just want to get work done. Pop!_OS is close enough to Ubuntu. And their window tiling extension is fantastic.

100% get that attitude.

I'm in the phase of slowly trying to learn Linux, and it's fun. But it also quickly becomes clear that there is no reward at the end. The endless different config file formats, man pages, shell mantras etc. don't really make computing any better in the end. They don't help one run CAD software, do CFD, write software, edit videos, make music, or any of the other things that are really what computing is about. Perhaps Ubuntu is the forever-distro after all.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#23
fvwm, since 1998.

I've started to use the new version 3 on desktop. But it still has got some problems when connecting/disconnecting monitors, so I use version 2 on the laptop where I need to do that.

No DE, unless you count LXQt as a basic session manager. I don't know why, but it seems things works more smoothly with a session manager instead of just starting fvwm from .xsession.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#25
Cinnamon. Every once in a while I try again Gnome and KDE but quickly go back to Cinnamon. It's the only DE where I'm mostly fine with the defaults. Everything else has to be tuned to death to be even remotely decent. Or they just crash because I have one monitor that requires HiDPI scaling and the other doesn't. I'm sad, nothing we have today is as good as Gnome 2 was.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#26
KDE Plasma on the latest Pop!OS from System76.

Why? It just feels more like what I'm comfortable with and works closer to the way I expect things to work. I'm one of those people who thinks that Win95 era Windows defined a desktop UI that needs little improvement, and KDE gives me that experience plus pretty much exactly the improvements I would want - virtual desktops being foremost on that list. The "Activities" stuff is neat, although I don't really use that facility a lot, but it complements the rest of the system nicely IMO.

What I explicitly don't want is any of these desktop environments that try to do what I consider "weird" stuff like blocking you from putting anything on the desktop, or forcing use of a Mac style menubar at the top of the screen.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#27
I’ve been using elementary OS (Pantheon) and I like so much about it, yet still often find it feeling a bit limited as a daily driver for software development work.

I’d like to try Gnome 40+ with one more distro hop, but if that doesn’t stick, then I’m likely to head back to KDE Plasma (Manjaro) since that’s been the best Linux experience I’ve had so far. Sane defaults, yet still easily customizable wherever I felt the need to.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#29
Arch, i3wm. Love having a personalized keyboard-first setup that I can say I've built over time.

A tip for those who may just be starting out: switch your LEFT-ALT and WIN keys. Also make caps lock act like ESC on tap and CTRL on long press. See xmodmap, setxkbmap and xcape for this.

Re: Ask HN: What's your Linux window manager and/or desktop environment?

#30
Awesome Window Manager, for a few reasons.

* I like being in direct control of a text file config.

* I don't use SystemD. (And before I get flamed, I think all alternatives suck too; I just use the default on Gentoo, but intend to replace it.)

* Using Awesome means that I don't have any extraneous processes running.

* Awesome is the closest to DWM (which has a design I like) while still being usable by mere mortals.

Post reply on HN