Live data from Hacker News

Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

maggrand.com

441–450 of 480 posts

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

assuming they did a 20 minute meeting for each employee thats 233 hours or 29 business days to fire all 700 of them...

Your unspoken assumption: A company of 6000 employees only has 1 manager/HR rep capable of talking to pink slip recipients.

Exactly. Hire 20 extra HR people to make that firing faster. Then fire the 20 HR people. It's simple.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#442
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disagree. Why make the HR team go through 900 individual calls? At the same time this will leak and other employees will learn that they might get fired before they get their own call. Recipe for disaster. Just rip off the band aid.

> Why make the HR team go through 900 individual calls? The entire reason companies have hierarchical power structures (in theory) at least, is so that information can be passed along with the log of the company size. Having every manager have 10 min call with each direct report, or in the worse case a team meeting, would be much more human and could accomplish the task of notification in roughly the same time window…

You got it right up until the point where you think it’s to pass information from top to down. It’s not. It’s to pass information from the bottom up.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#443
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't really fire 900 people on individual Zoom calls. After the first 10 minutes everyone will know what their meeting is about and it makes the problem worse. People will be texting their managers begging for information and the manager will have to lie for a day or two until they are authorized to say in the meeting.

Have you never been at a company that has had layoffs? I was at a company that did ~400 people layoff during pandemic. The place didn't even have a great culture but everyone, even people remaining (> half the company) got a one-on-one chat with their manager. There was, of course, a company all hands later. Sure people know what's up, but it's dramatically more human to have your manager call you and tell you a.) yo…

Not only is the all-hands layoff grotesque, but the guy spent a few minutes talking about how hard it is to fire people.

“I did this before and I cried”

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#444
post #187
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disagree. Why make the HR team go through 900 individual calls? At the same time this will leak and other employees will learn that they might get fired before they get their own call. Recipe for disaster. Just rip off the band aid.

I think it boils down to leadership is really about managing relationships. This method is just too impersonal for most people, just like breaking off a romantic relationship via text is generally considered weak and frowned upon.

Why would you need to text?

Surely after seeing your relationship status change on Facebook, they would understand?

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#445
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> After the first 10 minutes everyone will know what their meeting is about and it makes the problem worse. Huh? It’s not a surprise birthday party. I’m not sure why a key goal would be that each fired person is taken completely by surprise.

The reasons why may not be obvious if you're not a manager or haven't run a large organization before, but the simple truth is, "employees" are not a magically ethical bunch of people simply by virtue of being the underdog and poor and downtrodden and being all fired and stuff. You do not want a significant number of employees running around who are either uncertain they are going to be fired for a significant period…

The company could let employees in on key decision making and thus not create the environment of distrust and paranoia. Why is it ever a surprise how the company is doing? Solely, solely to keep employees ignorant of matters concerning their livelihoods. A company has the choices it cultivates for itself.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#446
post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Think about abuse in other contexts to put it in perspective. If a teacher in the middle of giving a homework assignment had said the same thing, would that be okay? What about a police officer who pulled someone over during a traffic stop? What about a customer at a drive thru saying this into the speaker? Calling a group of people "DUMB DOLPHINS" on an email chain ... Inappropriate, un professional, dis-respectfu…

I dunno. Seems clearly abusive to me from someone in a position of power. This wasn't said among friends at a bar or by or about someone unrelated to the people in question. It was their boss, or bosses boss.

my heart goes out to all the victims of abuse, but not the ones that one time were on an email chain and their bosses-boss called the team they were on a bunch of "dumb dolphins"

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#447

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Abuse? Really? Is a single email where someone vents frustration for 2 lines actually abuse ?

I knew you would get downvoted. HN is a weird mixture of professionalism and childishness. Getting angry at two lines without context/relationship with manager is all I could expect from here.

> I knew you would get downvoted

Hold on though. You don't have the full context/relationship between GP and the people who downvoted them. It would be irresponsible for you to jump to conclusions about Hackernews or those commenters based on just a one-line grayed out comment.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#448

I know this sounds horrible but in the days of covid and working from home, what are companies supposed to do if they have to lay off large amounts of people? Make them all risk their health to come to an in-person event, only to be fired? Drive to every employee's house to fire them in person? It obviously sucks but I don't see how, in 2021, this is any different from the kind of thing that would happen all the time…

He could have just sent an email. I would rather that than a zoom call. Or have your immediate manger let you know. I watched the video, it seemed more like he was looking for sympathy at how hard his job firing people was. No one cares, they care that they just lost their job.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#449

Many folks here are talking about the CEO and how the termination process was carried out, but I'd like to know if this is any sort of indicator for where the housing market is going. Zillow was just in the news for suddenly laying off about %25 of its employees and taking a ~$500m loss. Do any of you believe these companies have insight into the near feature that indicates a notable downturn in the market?

Zillow did some really stupid stuff that caused them to need to trim the waist a bit.

Re: Better.com CEO fires 900 employees on Zoom call

#450
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of you is trying to help these people find their next job.

I have a few qualms with this comment: 1. For a person who just lost their job, you can already search for such an opportunity yourself quite trivially by getting a resume, editing it locally with notepad, and then using email to send it. From Windows or Mac, this resume could be accessed through built-in software. 2. It doesn't actually replace a new job prospect. Most people I know choose to promote their startups…

Wait, what's the implication with this comment? I feel like you haven't thought through this satire completely.

The "joke" (deserved or not) with Brandon's comment about Dropbox is that it's widely perceived by a lot of people to have turned out to be wrong. So why are you formatting your argument to look like it's the same comment? You want to overlay the other person's argument into Brandon's comment if you're trying to mock them or make them seem out of touch; you accidentally executed this all backwards.

Doing it where you're pushing back against the offers to apply instead makes it seem like you're making a joke criticizing yourself for being out of touch with job searches.

Post reply on HN