Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
electronics360.globalspec.com
Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
1–10 of 71 posts
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#2Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#3of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#4of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
If they had driven the chip with a raspberry pi (or, more importantly, said so enough times to land the keyword in the article), they could have quadrupled the range of the PR stunt.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#5of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
You can mitigate this by having many gateway/collectors at high points on buildings/hills, but bouncing signals off the moon seems like an interesting alternative for connectivity in low coverage locations...
Perhaps this is clear to you I'm just trying to think it through out loud.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#6of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#7of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
Just a guess: given that LoRa operates on line of sight, when trying to update a gateways with sensor status (e.g. GPS position of tracked item) the operator won't be able to get realtime reports if the gateway isn't positioned at a high enough altitude relative to the sensor. You can mitigate this by having many gateway/collectors at high points on buildings/hills, but bouncing signals off the moon seems like an int…
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#8https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth–Moon–Earth_communicati...
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a guess: given that LoRa operates on line of sight, when trying to update a gateways with sensor status (e.g. GPS position of tracked item) the operator won't be able to get realtime reports if the gateway isn't positioned at a high enough altitude relative to the sensor. You can mitigate this by having many gateway/collectors at high points on buildings/hills, but bouncing signals off the moon seems like an int…
Moonbounce isn't practical for any real application nowadays. It's a fun experiment and a PR stunt.
Re: Bouncing a LoRa message off the moon
#10of all the things to bounce off the moon, why a consumer IoT protocol? Alien 1: The humans are talking again. Alien 2: What did they say? Alien 1: The front door is locked.
Just a guess: given that LoRa operates on line of sight, when trying to update a gateways with sensor status (e.g. GPS position of tracked item) the operator won't be able to get realtime reports if the gateway isn't positioned at a high enough altitude relative to the sensor. You can mitigate this by having many gateway/collectors at high points on buildings/hills, but bouncing signals off the moon seems like an int…
The other big issue is that it doesn't scale, because there's no directionality: the reflected signal will be scattered off the moon and received everywhere on the hemisphere of earth where the moon is above the horizon. So every single device that tried to use this strategy would have to contend for the same chunk of bandwidth.