Live data from Hacker News

You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

mastodon.technology

291–300 of 318 posts

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#291
post #49

Off topic, but I've never seen mastodon linked like this before on HN. Interesting this this might've normally been a link to a tweet.

I've just joined the technology mastodon because of this link.

World Domination!!! ;-)

Ping me: @dredmorbius@toot.cat

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#292
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

Who in tech do you hold up as an ideal persona? I'm not defending what happened to you. It's surprising to me that even someone like Jimmy Wales, who pioneered the most impactful knowledge-sharing project in the world, is vilified by some people.

No one. Every name I can think of has had some great ideas, and some truly cockeyed are-you-kidding-me-seriously" moments.

Even legendary names are just humans. TBL and his support for DRM. LT's notorious personality. Page & Schmidt and completely losing sight of the helpfulness they started from.

Worship / revere / appreciate no one. Filter their good, acknowledge their bad, find a path past them to something better, and know you'll probably be corrupted by something along the way unless you somehow transcend your own DNA.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's the option of simply not visiting the webpages that offend you. I'm not going to change my writing / guide style just because some people outside of those gaming communities don't like the way they work. Its one thing if you were the target audience, its a totally different thing if you're just a meta-commentator talking about the internet in general.

Maybe that explains your results. Have a behaviour someone dislikes, they don't revisit, and thus don’t answer your survey question

I ask on the community forums or on the Discords. These websites have no direct feedback mechanism.

The feedback I get is like "That's a confusing paragraph", or "That's a bad strategy. You should be writing about X instead".

No one actually cares about the auto-playing videos, unless they're not working. (On page X on Safari, that video doesn't seem to be working was one complaint I got... and then I had to transcode my MP4 settings to get it working there).

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#294
post #239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't most (all?) of the content on fandom.com under a Creative Commons license? Is there anything stopping someone from scraping all the content and forking the projects, giving it a more humane and user-friendly interface?

I’m currently working with a number of folks to fork a wiki off of Fandom. Forking the content itself is easy but good luck beating Fandom on a search page.

The origin story for this is reminiscent of how AO3 got going. Maybe if you partner with them, make a "Wiki Of Our Own" sister project, it would get more traction and then move up the search rankings organically?

Although checking the AO3 wiki page, man I didn't expect them to have hosting costs that high.

Do you have a project site? I might be interested in contributing.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you solicit feedback on auto playing or videos in general? Your comment seems to say 2 while advocating for 1. On your website your videos don't auto play for me on mobile, by the way, which I found convenient because it's tap on tap off. It's x-overflowing the videos though, which is inconvenient.

>Did you solicit feedback on auto playing or videos in general? Of course they didn't. If they did, the site wouldn't work the way it works now. It's just another example of "I know better than my users" attitude.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29348328

Funny, everyone likes the autoplaying GIFs in this other context, but they hate it here.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#296

Off topic, but I've never seen mastodon linked like this before on HN. Interesting this this might've normally been a link to a tweet.

I have a bad feeling about these "invite only" servers though. They are remaking the blue checkmarks of twitter in an even less-transparent way.

You don't need to use any particular server to publish to this ecosystem. You don't even need to use the Mastodon software. Just hook up the AP plugin to your WordPress (or insert necessary logic into your CMS of choice) and you're a participant.

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#297
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't even think it's technically possible. Unless a bluetooth device is in discoverable mode it shouldn't be possible to identify them.

I interviewed at a place that managed traffic light behavior and they had a system to evaluate traffic efficiency by watching traffic flow through the whole area, tracked using ambient Bluetooth signals from phones.

>tracked using ambient Bluetooth signals from phones.

What does this mean? Are they just measuring radio power levels in the 2.4GHz spectrum, and using that to determine whether a car is there or not? Or are they actually somehow capturing bluetooth signals, decoding them, and extracting identifiers (eg. MAC) from them?

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#298

Not just news sites, either. A lot of fandom wikis run on the same platform, fandom.com. That site is a pain in the absolute fucking ass to use on any mobile device, specifically because of the autoplaying video that takes up half the screen on every page load . Weirdly, desktop is fine; no autoplaying videos or any such nonsense. It's only on mobile that Fandom has seemingly made a deliberate effort to make the user…

Hosted mediawiki isn't cheap, so I don't see another player coming into the market. The consolidation of gamepedia into "Fandom" is the worst in this respect.

Memory Alpha (primary Star Trek wiki) is another one that was self-hosted and as a user of it I mostly just accepted that sometimes it would be down due to Mediawiki upgrades or traffic reasons or otherwise. They also migrated to Wikia when shared hosting seemed like a better deal than hosting Mediawiki themselves, and now in the "Fandom" age it's just irritating that it is no longer just disconnected shared hosting (which Wikia had briefly promised to Memory Alpha that it would stay independent) and is now such a blatant advertising infested cash grab. I don't directly know who runs that wiki, but I do sometimes wonder (as a user) if they regret the consolidation (and if they have any escape plans).

Re: You click a link to a news site, to read an article that seems interesting

#299
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many of our parents had better lives overall despite less education, fewer hours worked, shorter commuting distance, etc. Yes, tech is better than most other jobs, but most tech jobs just give you the middle class life many people had 20-30 years ago (aside from the tech gadgets that didn’t exist 20-30 years ago that even the poor have now). In terms of large expenses and free time rather than gadgets, we’re no bette…

I work in education, so not highly paid, bought a car and a house by myself, and easily manage to save £500/month. I just don't waste my money on stupid things like paying other people to make my sandwiches and drinks, or gadgets that are priced as 10x what they cost to make.

Can you give more information? Are you in London or another major city in the UK?
Post reply on HN