Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but usually good actors have an abundance of mitigating evidence at their disposal You must be joking. That's not how it works when the government has you in their crosshairs. >and it's usually just easier to say "here's the evidence, we're not guilty". And then the government will spend years and millions of dollars trying to poke holes in that evidence of innocence. Anyone who follows the news has seen this repea…
I am talking about white collar crime, which tends to be much more black and white than terrorism. And no, the government doesn't have a history of spending millions in trying to chase frivolous cases. Has it happened? Sure. But prosecutors are graded on their closure rate which is why you see so many settlements. The last thing they want is to waste millions on a witch hunt. You only see the bad. You say "anyone who…
Even in an imaginary world where Tether is a completely legitimate business not operating in violation of any existing laws, there would be no way for them to make government investigations go away within any reasonable timeframe.
It is simply ridiculous of you to suggest that we could expect the government to play fair when dealing with Tether.