Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The trick is to untangle it. USAID is specifically designed and called that so as to tangle it , tell me, how would your average joe understand that USAID is a intelligence agency spinoff designed to sound "good" while doing evil all over the world rather than what its name suggests? You know... Aid? The NSA, CIA, Extraordinary Rendition and so many other things dont exist there by accident, if said """government""…
It seems obvious that USAID is an intelligence front (I've encountered a few instances where it was mentioned that someone worked for USAID at the time, while it was simultaneously obvious that it would make way more sense if they were Intelligence), but is there any concrete evidence for that?
FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
471–474 of 474 posts
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#472Earlier quoted context omitted.
I went to a major cell provider and asked them nicely for access to SMS for all their customers and they happily took money and gave me an API. This was for a startup. I have no doubt they do the same for governments.
If I understand this correctly you’re saying a major cell provider is selling you access to subscriber SMS message content?
Still. It meant a very powerful API key had to be protected and never abused.
I can only imagine others obtain God SMS access like this with less than ethical intentions.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
A couple years after 9/11, my father and I had donated to the Holy Land foundation. The IRS proceeded to audit me (16 years old) and my $8k a year woodselling business I had with my dad. You tell me.
That's absolutely fucked. The whole story of the Holy Land Foundation being railroaded and labeled as terrorists when all they did was advocate for human rights of Palestinians...it's an incredibly chilling story. To hear that those who merely donated to a worthy cause were also then audited...the outrageous injustice makes my blood boil.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#474Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fifth amendment doesn't protect either speech or biometrics. Nor does it protect passwords.
You are wrong. It protects passwords as speech, as they are testimonial, per many court rulings. It does not protect biometrics based on law that basically says the police can force you to give up your fingerprints for their records, so they can sure as fuck force your finger onto a reader.