FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
propertyofthepeople.org
FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
1–10 of 474 posts
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#2https://propertyofthepeople.org/document-detail/?doc-id=2111...
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#3Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#4And Whatsapp will give them the target's full contactbook (was to be expected), but also everyone that has the target in their contact list. That last one is quite far reaching.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#5So if you have something to hide, don't use iCloud backup. And Whatsapp will give them the target's full contactbook (was to be expected), but also everyone that has the target in their contact list. That last one is quite far reaching.
even a second-party is a risk.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#6Either way looks like Signal wins by a lot. The size of it spot is so small, it seems almost squeezed in. But only because they have nothing to share.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#7So if you have something to hide, don't use iCloud backup. And Whatsapp will give them the target's full contactbook (was to be expected), but also everyone that has the target in their contact list. That last one is quite far reaching.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#8So if you have something to hide, don't use iCloud backup. And Whatsapp will give them the target's full contactbook (was to be expected), but also everyone that has the target in their contact list. That last one is quite far reaching.
Re: FBI's ability to legally access secure messaging app content and metadata [pdf]
#9It says Telegram has no message content. Isn't telegram not E2EE by default, instead required explicit steps to make a conversation encrypted? Either way looks like Signal wins by a lot. The size of it spot is so small, it seems almost squeezed in. But only because they have nothing to share.