AWS Private 5G
81–90 of 370 posts
Re: AWS Private 5G
#82Re: AWS Private 5G
#83Re: AWS Private 5G
#84I wonder if this is a product that was built on top of something they needed to use internally. Makes me wonder how Amazon is using this technology for themselves... Anyone care to speculate?
I would guess it's more aimed at use in large factories, warehouses and yards, where WiFi is not going to be practical. I did a stint as a (software) architect for a large Norwegian engineering company, and at the time they were looking at getting a private 4G network setup, as their facilities were absolutely huge. I did a little research, and quite a few mobile operators actually offer private 4G networks for exact…
Re: AWS Private 5G
#85How long until Amazon takes on the existing cell companies?
Re: AWS Private 5G
#86Now imagine a future where every device you buy is connected to the internet wirelessly, whether you like it or not.
Re: AWS Private 5G
#87Re: AWS Private 5G
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see a potential use of it from IoT devices. An eg. a tractor wants to communicate with a central server for commands.
I fear what this means in larger scale. All Amazon manufactured physical IoT and hardware could have sidechannel in the future to escape network isolation. They already have this "feature" which expands your home network for neighbor Amazon devices if they need Internet access. And default setting is "ON", not off. How many consumer is aware of that? https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Sidewalk/b/?node=21328123011
Re: AWS Private 5G
#89Spectrum questions aside (which obviously one of the biggest one), could this enable running Helium 5G on AWS? -- Edit: I don't own any Helium, just curious from tech side what this new AWS service could offer. Not sure the downvotes are particularly about Helium or any crypto related discussion.
Why do peole care about helium so much?
Re: AWS Private 5G
#90Probably worth noting that the regular cell providers can also provide SIMS that dump the end device into your existing, normal private network rather than the internet. I don't know how this service differs in pricing, so it's hard to quantify when this AWS service would be a better idea outside of coverage issues.
I would assume that'd be so nickle and dimed by CISPs (probably trying to milk the enterprise cow) that nobody either knows or cares about that.