Live data from Hacker News

I resigned from Twitter

twitter.com

611–620 of 1001 posts

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#611

The stock popped 10%. Is this a vote of confidence against him or for whoever has been waiting in the wings? There has been enough agitation against him by the activists that this can’t be a surprise.

Twitter is extremely toxic and divisive, and Dorsey is... the same. People are hoping his removal will allow the platform to mature.

Are you trying to say this is Twitter's version of Uber's Travis Kalanick getting pushed to the exit moment?

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#612

Happy to see a CTO promoted to CEO, hopefully a signal that Twitter is still committed to growing/incubating the engineering side of the business.

I agree, but is Twitter really suffering with any engineering problems? I generally would like to see a CTO come in charge but here's a unique case where someone from product might be more suitable.

yes, Twitter is crawling with bugs and problems of scale (with an obvious lack of user support).

see /r/twitter for a summary of issues people see on a day to day basis.

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN is heavily moderated, which is interesting given how often it is used as a platform to decry censorship.

Can you provide specific examples please? It would seem that it moderates trolling content, self promotional or bot level garbage.

That in itself makes it more heavily moderated than Facebook or Twitter, though of course that’s also attributable to manageable scale.

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#616
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> people on the opposite side of the privileged class are barely allowed to exist on those platforms - only if they police their speech very carefully to avoid breaking a myriad of vague and unwritten rules, and even then they're still subject to being unpersoned for some perceived offense committed off-platform. I'm having trouble understanding what any of this means

Parent is saying that these platforms cater to left leaning reactionaries ("social justice warriors"), and that people on the opposite side (conservatives) are far more restricted, but most of the criticism comes from those same left leaning reactionaries about the sites not further restricting the already-restricted side.

What is it that conservatives are not able to say on Twitter due to restrictions?

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#618

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry but cynically toxic and divisive algos drives more attention thus more ad revenue (see FB), it's not going to get better with a more investor friendly CEO

I think twitter moderation has been so overtly one sided that there is plenty of profit to be made by warming up to the other side.

Do you have examples to share? From what I've seen of posts taken down and/or accounts banned it seems to be people spewing severe vitriol - and that's on both sides.

Re: I resigned from Twitter

#620

It will be interesting to see how Twitter changes as a result. Twitter with selective following and setting your timeline to 'time order' creates a pretty good environment for me. It feels like the equivalent of living in only a few chosen 'subreddits' rather than getting the full frontal reddit experience.

The difference for me has always beem that Twitter is organized by person rather than by topic. In some ways that's good if I'm following someone because I care about them personally, but usually I follow people because I'm interested in a particular aspect of their work like art or announcements. In those cases, I don't want to hear about their political opinions or what their child did that week. I know you can follow topics as well, but that often seems overwhelming and imprecise. Social media as a platform is just incredibly confusing in the way it blurs the line between performer and audience.
Post reply on HN