Typora 1.0
support.typora.io
Typora 1.0
1–10 of 103 posts
Re: Typora 1.0
#2Ouch
Re: Typora 1.0
#35 years later, started to think it would never bother!
$15 is a no brainer given how much I personally use it. Have recently found myself dipping into/staying in vscode more and more for version controlled markdown though.
Re: Typora 1.0
#4I have used Typora, it's alright — but it's definitely no Obsidian[^1] Typora is very limited in terms of plugins / customisability — although it's standard feature set might be enough
Obsidian is my new Emacs, it rules my life through some plugins I've written for myself, it can be a simple focus driven markdown editor like Typora if I need it to be, or a full knowledge suite like Notion and the likes of that all while managed by git.
I can't see a reason as to why I would ever use Typora over Obsidian, but I might not be the target user.
[^1]: https://obsidian.md
Re: Typora 1.0
#5The release notes don't include release dates, but if the Twitter account registration date is to be trusted, Typora has been around since late 2014.
A one time 15$ purchase is a steal for all the value I got out of the beta versions over the years.
Even Sublime Text 3's monumentally long beta period appears brief when compared with Typora's.
Re: Typora 1.0
#6I have used Typora, it's alright — but it's definitely no Obsidian[^1] Typora is very limited in terms of plugins / customisability — although it's standard feature set might be enough Obsidian is my new Emacs, it rules my life through some plugins I've written for myself, it can be a simple focus driven markdown editor like Typora if I need it to be, or a full knowledge suite like Notion and the likes of that all wh…
Typora is a WYSIWYG editor, while Obsidian isn't (atleast not without plugins).
I do find myself editing my obsidian files inside of Typora on a semi-regular basis.
Re: Typora 1.0
#7I have used Typora, it's alright — but it's definitely no Obsidian[^1] Typora is very limited in terms of plugins / customisability — although it's standard feature set might be enough Obsidian is my new Emacs, it rules my life through some plugins I've written for myself, it can be a simple focus driven markdown editor like Typora if I need it to be, or a full knowledge suite like Notion and the likes of that all wh…
Typora is nice for the clean WYSIWYG editing experience, but now that Obsidian has Live Preview mode (currently in Insider-access beta) I had actually just uninstalled Typora because I was having trouble updating it and didn't feel like dealing with figuring out why.
I guess the new licensing is why, heh.
Re: Typora 1.0
#8People want to (eventually) be compensated for their hard work and the value you derive from their hard work. Not a shock.
Re: Typora 1.0
#9I just realized I wanted to buy it even if I don't use it just because it is an honest one time purchase with no attached subscription madness.
Re: Typora 1.0
#10I have used Typora, it's alright — but it's definitely no Obsidian[^1] Typora is very limited in terms of plugins / customisability — although it's standard feature set might be enough Obsidian is my new Emacs, it rules my life through some plugins I've written for myself, it can be a simple focus driven markdown editor like Typora if I need it to be, or a full knowledge suite like Notion and the likes of that all wh…
100% agree. In addition, Obsidian has a great Vim mode, which is something that we've been asking for in Typora for years [0]. Typora is less buggy than Codemirror, but it's a small price to pay for native keybondings. I've now completely switched over to it, from a combination of Typora and Inkdrop.
Obsidian still doesn't replicate Typora's clean aesthetic though. It's something I really wish it had - some kind of clean Zen mode. A clean theme / zen plugin is on my list of wishful weekend hack TODOs.