Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's really not. Frequency is nearly meaningless as you can have as many computational elements as you like operating at a given frequency meaning it tells you nearly nothing. It's like counting transistors which actually DOES work even if imperfectly.
But neurons are like compitational elements. There are different sorts with different power. In fact some human neurons have features that no other neurons have.
Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
701–704 of 704 posts
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#702Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like jokes but all jokes aside Jordan Peterson’s material helped me get off of opiates
Hilarious considering his benzo addiction nearly killed him.
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#703Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have stepped on a dogs foot. It made a “Yipe!” noise and leapt back. Then it approached me “submissively”, with it’s head held low and tail down. It seems rather “obvious” to me that the animal felt pain, reacted suddenly to the sensation, and then completely changed it’s demeanour towards me.
I believe the person you're responding to is referencing solipsism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism
The only reason why we know it own pain exist is, well, because it hurts :)
(But once again, I think the theory that other people and animals also feel pain is reasonable and probably the truth)
Re: Octopuses, crabs and lobsters to be recognised as sentient beings under UK law
#704Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eating farm animals requires you to grow 9 times as many crops to feed them as if you had just eaten the crops directly, since only about 9% of the food they eat is converted into edible flesh. So even if you take this argument seriously, the insects and field animals are better off if you grow fewer crops, which you accomplish by directly eating the crops you grow, not feeding them to livestock.
> Eating farm animals requires you to grow 9 times as many crops to feed them as if you had just eaten the crops directly This applies to industrial meat production. Do your thoughts change in regards to hunting/fishing which doesn't (necessarily*) rely on industrial crop agriculture? (I realize a lot of species population numbers - especially deer in the Midwest - are inflated due to the availability of crops for th…