Live data from Hacker News

Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

who.int

41–50 of 337 posts

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#41
post #32

Interesting choice to pick "Omicron" instead of "Nu," which news outlets had been expecting them to use. Perhaps this allows them to avoid having to use "Xi" as the name of a Covid variant, which would have been...inconvenient for the WHO.

Have you heard about the nu variant? No, what’s it called? The nu variant Yeah, does it have a name? It’s nu Yeah I know it’s new but what do they call it? What does who call it? That’s what I’m asking you! What does WHO call it?

Naturally.

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#42
>Using this approach, this variant has been detected at faster rates than previous surges in infection, suggesting that this variant may have a growth advantage.

Really? I wonder how much of this is "it's very easy to spot in the pcr" and we don't have to Redeploy tests..

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#43

"In recent weeks, infections have increased steeply, coinciding with the detection of B.1.1.529 variant. The first known confirmed B.1.1.529 infection was from a specimen collected on 9 November 2021. This variant has a large number of mutations, some of which are concerning. Preliminary evidence suggests an increased risk of reinfection with this variant, as compared to other VOCs. The number of cases of this varian…

The mainstream vaccine narrative has needed additional supporting evidence to state with confidence that vaccinations after previous infection should be a requirement… it’s only natural a new variant should occur with the exact fit needed.

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#45

"In recent weeks, infections have increased steeply, coinciding with the detection of B.1.1.529 variant. The first known confirmed B.1.1.529 infection was from a specimen collected on 9 November 2021. This variant has a large number of mutations, some of which are concerning. Preliminary evidence suggests an increased risk of reinfection with this variant, as compared to other VOCs. The number of cases of this varian…

The mainstream vaccine narrative has needed additional supporting evidence to state with confidence that vaccinations after previous infection should be a requirement… it’s only natural a new variant should occur with the exact fit needed.

You realise this is mostly the case in the US?

In the EU - previous infection and recovery gives you a COVID Pass - some countries are doing a single shot after infection at most to count you as vaccinated (Spain I believe does this) which is consistent with the data we have

It’s mostly the US that has an insane vacine policy.

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#46
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you heard about the nu variant? No, what’s it called? The nu variant Yeah, does it have a name? It’s nu Yeah I know it’s new but what do they call it? What does who call it? That’s what I’m asking you! What does WHO call it?

Naturally.

I don’t even know what I’m _talking_ about!

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nu means naked in Portuguese (and Spanish I think?) Maybe they wanted to avoid all the lazy puns. A pretty significant part of the world speaks either of those two languages.

It would probably be reported as Ni or Ny in Spanish: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfabeto_griego#Letras

Yeah but why bother? Why is this a big deal? Just having a funny/dumb pun to the name means you might as well avoid it tbh.

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#49

Interesting choice to pick "Omicron" instead of "Nu," which news outlets had been expecting them to use. Perhaps this allows them to avoid having to use "Xi" as the name of a Covid variant, which would have been...inconvenient for the WHO.

Nu means naked in Portuguese (and Spanish I think?) Maybe they wanted to avoid all the lazy puns. A pretty significant part of the world speaks either of those two languages.

"Nu" means nude in Portuguese, French and Catalan, but that's the masculine form, whereas the noun variant is feminine, therefore "nu variant" would never be mistaken for "nude variant". But even if it could be misinterpreted, I don't think anybody would care.

Re: Classification of Omicron (B.1.1.529): SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern

#50

Interesting choice to pick "Omicron" instead of "Nu," which news outlets had been expecting them to use. Perhaps this allows them to avoid having to use "Xi" as the name of a Covid variant, which would have been...inconvenient for the WHO.

What is the problem with Xi? Perhaps there is a second meaning I don't know?

Because if WHO like any other multi national agency is afraid to offend China.
Post reply on HN