Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems you are stating that fingerprints do not identify an account holder. You should justify the statement.
No, I'm stating that fingerprints to not have the same security and privacy properties as usernames. Therefore they are not equivalent to usernames. * Usernames can be changed. Fingerprints can't. * Usernames can be denied. Fingerprints can't. * Usernames are zero effort to copy. Fingerprints require some skill and effort (if you have a decent fingerprint reader). * People are happy to share usernames online. Fingerp…
Fingerprints can be hacked
271–280 of 333 posts
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#272Earlier quoted context omitted.
On Android (don't know about iOS) you can take photos without even unlocking - double press on the power button opens the camera. You can't access anything else (including existing photos in the camera roll).
True, and it is a step in right direction. However I still don't want to expose my bank app credentials every time I show someone my vacation photos.
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#273Earlier quoted context omitted.
At least on iPhones though they have a way to activate a mode that prevents the use of TouchID and FaceID. If I press the power button on my phone 5 times in a row that turns that off. Yes I still run the risk of my device being unlocked against my will if I'm caught by surprise. But I'm able to disable this functionality in places where I think the risk of that may be higher, e.g. while traveling. I'll still take th…
On modern FaceID phones you need to hold the power and down volume key to bring up the Reset/PowerOff and cancel. Just clicking multiple times will bring up wallet, siri, or do nothing.
On my iPhone 13, just now, I rapidly clicked the power button 5x.
The phone immediately made a loud sound and put up a screen that said "Emergency SOS". There was an option to "cancel" it, but I assume that the phone would have contacted 911 in short order unless I quickly cancelled.
So the correct description is probably "it depends".
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#274Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the evidence that shows up at a court case is forgeable. Simply showing that a particular piece of evidence could be forged in no way proves that it is forged. You would need some sort of argument to prove your contention.
All evidence is ultimately forgeable. At some point a modern day Godel could prove that “justice” in a free society is mathematically impossible. The law has to operate within a practical compromise and err heavily on the side of reducing false convictions.
That is an article I was reading today. I don't know what is wrong with America.
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#275Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords. Here is an excellent (and timeless) post on this fact: https://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2013/10/fingerprints-are-use...
> Fingerprints are usernames, not passwords. Here is an excellent (and timeless) post on this fact No, that is complete absolute shit post that isn't even self coherent. Like, it literally whines about needing something that can be "independently chosen, changed, and rotated", which obviously describes usernames so obviously biometrics can't possibly be usernames by that very post! Why is this dumb meme so fucking pe…
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#276Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could work for a digital intrusion, but for crime scenes there is dna
DNA evidence is overrated. People leave their DNA everywhere, so it's not that hard to get some and then plant it somewhere else. The tests also have varying accuracy rates, but people misunderstand what it means. If the test is 99.99% accurate, that doesn't mean that there is a 99.99% chance that the defendant is the perpetrator. It means that in a region with ten million people, you've whittled your suspect list do…
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#277Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m waiting on a court case with a fingerprint as key evidence for conviction, in which the defendant brings this up. Might not pass reasonable doubt muster, but what if somebody sold fingerprint forgery kits online that made it push-button simple? Just supply an image or two, run it through some ML to reconstruct the print, laser etch a latex glove or similar… I wonder if you could use CRISPR or “lab-grown meat” tec…
Why in the world would you need CRISPR or lab grown meat? Just sequence the DNA and send it off to a DNA assembly service. The price is a couple hundred bucks a pop. You don't have to replicate the entire DNA, just the segments used for forensic PCR. (On a side note, the state of biotechnology and life science knowledge on HN is utterly deplorable, repeating buzz words does not reality make.)
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#278My favorite photograph of a fingerprint is when the Chaos Computer Club reproduced the German Foreign ministers fingerprint from a photo. So much for military grade security. https://www.dw.com/en/german-defense-minister-von-der-leyens... - The core problems with biometrics are that: 1) Not revokable (unlike compromised credentials) 2) Not a secret 3) Usually trivial to reproduce and spoof (even "liveliness" tests)
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#279Earlier quoted context omitted.
DNA evidence is overrated. People leave their DNA everywhere, so it's not that hard to get some and then plant it somewhere else. The tests also have varying accuracy rates, but people misunderstand what it means. If the test is 99.99% accurate, that doesn't mean that there is a 99.99% chance that the defendant is the perpetrator. It means that in a region with ten million people, you've whittled your suspect list do…
Yeah I always wonder when you hear like "99% DNA match!!". So like you confirmed the DNA is probably from a human?
But even then, people use percentages as if everyone's DNA was independent. Which it isn't. Blood relatives have similar DNA.
The one thing DNA is really good for is excluding people. If you have the rapist's DNA and you accurately test it against the suspect's DNA and it doesn't match, it's not them.
Re: Fingerprints can be hacked
#280Earlier quoted context omitted.
On Android (don't know about iOS) you can take photos without even unlocking - double press on the power button opens the camera. You can't access anything else (including existing photos in the camera roll).
True, and it is a step in right direction. However I still don't want to expose my bank app credentials every time I show someone my vacation photos.