Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
71–80 of 340 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#72Mazda seems to be heading the right direction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20200335
They make a very shitty EV though.
If not then I guess it's a lot different from the 2019 Mazda 6 I own. It's been great. Not what the parent is looking for probably but it has no gimmicks - I find every convenience usable. The adaptive lights, the active cruise, lane assist, automatic transmission, keyless system, seat memory, HUD, 360 cam. Yes, I know these are kind of basics now but still, I come from Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 land - all the gimmicks that car had was ABS ;)
Only knit pick I have is you can't turn off the radio, you can only mute it. Had the same feeling when I bought my first iPod and discovered that sleep was it's natural state... Got used to it somehow ;)
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#73Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#74Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#75Good question. A follow-up: What's the best low(er)-digitalization EV (ideally BEV, but alternatively PHEV)? Something with more tactile/analog UI and a minimum of "entertainment" accessories?
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#76Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#77Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#78They don't sell them in the US anymore, but I drive a 2019 Honda Fit and it's great. Very versatile (holds four adults, 8ft lumber, 36" doors, etc). The base trim is very tech-lite: bluetooth radio but nothing fancier than that, physically controlled hvac and chair controls, traditional key, basic LTMS (no dedicated chips in the tires, just a calculation based on different angular velocity across the wheels), etc. It…
> It's a dying breed though, complicated "driver assist" systems are becoming standard or even mandated :(. It saves lives, even if the systems are not 100% effective.
Small cars with low hoods and good visibility don't need those systems nearly as much as large SUV's with dangerous hood designs and poor side/rear visibility. I think we should focus on the total safety of the vehicle instead of pushing everything to be bigger and more expensive which makes car ownership hard for poorer people.
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Problem is, up here in the north, cars start rusting away before they are otherwise unusable.
I would honestly pay 5k for a one-time rust prevention fix if it were a long term solution. I have a wonderful Toyota 4Runner in great condition - except for the terrible rust. It will definitely die a rusty death.
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
My Fit has been absolutely great. I’ve learned a lot by working on it, but I do have the say that the plastic engine protector is a travesty. Clips were originally broken during a commercial oil change. Ever since, I’ve just been using self tapping screws to reattach it.
Wow, you shouldn't have self tapping screws anywhere near an engine bay. But since you know what they are, I guess their danger is minimized. It is quite OK to run w/o an engine cover, it is a worthless piece of plastic.
But yea, completely non-functional. Remove it if the clips are broken. You aren't missing anything.