It's Not All In Your Head
firstthings.com
It's Not All In Your Head
1–10 of 96 posts
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#2Alas, the author reaches a mountain of a question (as a side note, at that): why are we so dissatisfied with human imperfections?
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#3> “The dream of a fully frictionless existence, a world of highly efficient cyborgs. Because if you’re not perfectly productive, if you let up for even a moment, you must be sick: The forces of decay will swallow you whole.“ Alas, the author reaches a mountain of a question (as a side note, at that): why are we so dissatisfied with human imperfections?
> The closer men came to perfecting for themselves a paradise, the more impatient they became with it, and with themselves as well. They made a garden of pleasure, and became progressively more miserable with it as it grew in richness and power and beauty; for then, perhaps, it was easier to see something was missing in the garden, some tree or shrub that would not grow. When the world was in darkness and wretchedness, it could believe in perfection and yearn for it. But when the world became bright with reason and riches, it began to sense the narrowness of the needle's eye, and that rankled for a world no longer willing to believe or yearn.
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#4> “The dream of a fully frictionless existence, a world of highly efficient cyborgs. Because if you’re not perfectly productive, if you let up for even a moment, you must be sick: The forces of decay will swallow you whole.“ Alas, the author reaches a mountain of a question (as a side note, at that): why are we so dissatisfied with human imperfections?
For your specific question, I really like the take from Walter M. Miller Jr.'s "A Canticle for Leibowitz" (one of my favorite novels): > The closer men came to perfecting for themselves a paradise, the more impatient they became with it, and with themselves as well. They made a garden of pleasure, and became progressively more miserable with it as it grew in richness and power and beauty; for then, perhaps, it was ea…
edit: typo
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#5Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#6The future truly is strange.
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
For your specific question, I really like the take from Walter M. Miller Jr.'s "A Canticle for Leibowitz" (one of my favorite novels): > The closer men came to perfecting for themselves a paradise, the more impatient they became with it, and with themselves as well. They made a garden of pleasure, and became progressively more miserable with it as it grew in richness and power and beauty; for then, perhaps, it was ea…
Hadn't heard of this book, I'll have to check it out. It vaguely reminds of something Dostoevsky's Underground Man might have said when he was railing against the utopian rationalists. edit: typo
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#8> “The dream of a fully frictionless existence, a world of highly efficient cyborgs. Because if you’re not perfectly productive, if you let up for even a moment, you must be sick: The forces of decay will swallow you whole.“ Alas, the author reaches a mountain of a question (as a side note, at that): why are we so dissatisfied with human imperfections?
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#9> “The dream of a fully frictionless existence, a world of highly efficient cyborgs. Because if you’re not perfectly productive, if you let up for even a moment, you must be sick: The forces of decay will swallow you whole.“ Alas, the author reaches a mountain of a question (as a side note, at that): why are we so dissatisfied with human imperfections?
Re: It's Not All In Your Head
#10Former VICE journalist, dirtbag left guy, and one time Something Awful poster Sam Kriss is reviewing a Tao Lin novel in the conservative Catholic journal First Things? The future truly is strange.