Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, if the customer owed something/missed a payment, then this letter makes sense. This customer didn't owe anything, so clearly this letter wasn't intended for them, but got it by an error. I'm all for pitchforking Comcast and other giants who have terrible business practices, but this article seems like it's trying to drum up angst when this can clearly be explained by a mistake. If I had bad debt and an option…
This type of letter doesn't make sense no matter what, and if people receive something like this they should immediately file a complaint with the FTC for FCRA violations.
and which FCRA violation specifically? Basic read of FCRA... I don't see one.