Tells you something about Apple's testing methodology. QA team at Apple must be playing real fast and loose. Being affected by 3 serious regressions in Lion (all filed as bugs and Apple closed them as duplicates, btw) - I get the feeling that Apple could do better at software engineering. (Alarms on iOS if you are still not convinced :) Just the fact that they release software that allows authentication without corre…
Tells you something about Apple's testing methodology. QA team at Apple must be playing real fast and loose. Yep, I agree. I've been very disappointed with Lion, even taking into account the common "Don't buy an x.0 Apple product", there were some terrible bugs (I was personally bitten by the inability to look up DNS servers after waking from sleep, which I can't believe was missed in testing). Apple's software quali…
People have said the same thing about nearly every OS X release (with the possible exception of 10.1). At least Lion doesn't erase your firewire hard drives [1], or delete your entire home folder [2] etc etc. The comparative severity of these really bad bugs can be debated, but I think in terms of general quality OS X 10.0 − 10.2 really were quite a lot worse than the more recent releases.
I don't disagree with your general point though, the Mac is obviously not their priority anymore, and hasn't been for a while.
[1] http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/10/61031
[2] http://macs.about.com/b/2009/10/13/snow-leopard-may-delete-u...