Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd argue that it doesn't play that big of a role in the functioning of the government. Privacy abuse has been pretty non-partisan for decades. As Chomsky would say, the areas of intersection between the parties represent the institutional power outside the democratic process. For example, the American people do not have a choice in how to treat Snowden, he has been deemed a treasonous criminal of the state, regardle…
I don't disagree that privacy abuse for various goals, or some governmental policies (like the treatment of Snowden) are not beholden to public opinion. Although the counterargument might be the intensity of public opinion on the topic. My main argument is specifically around whether the US is veering towards the implementation of a social credit score (which I think would look like having ones credit score be impact…
the world is much different than it was 30 years ago. I'm sure many would be appalled by the lack of privacy and governmental overreach.
Also, in the current era, the division of the populace, to the point where many actively hate the other side and think they are evil, is the exact conditions where a social credit score could become palatable if you believed the other side would be affected more.
Just look at the current trend of cancel culture. Its not that far of a leap to make that government policy