Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
1–10 of 270 posts
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#2Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#3Yes. Yes there is.
This is particularly important when a thread is fresh because threads are so sensitive to initial conditions.
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#4Yes. Yes there is.
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#5Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#6I originally left this comment a few months ago, but: CA especially has been underbuilding housing for close to 50 years (https://techcrunch.com/2014/04/14/sf-housing/) and now has a severe housing shortage, to the point where a parodic response, like "California will try absolutely anything to reduce homelessness, except build more housing" (https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-will-do-anything-to-en...) is the only reasonable one.
I've worked on Prop HHH and other proposals designed to reduce homelessness in California: https://seliger.com/2017/08/30/l-digs-hole-slowly-economics-..., but none of them work, or can work, without making housing easier to build.
Before someone mentions "mental illness" and "drugs" and other contributors to homelessness, yes those are real factors: that said, the lower the cost of housing, the easier it is for someone on the margin of being housed or being homeless to stay housed. The lower the cost, the easier it is for family, SSDI, Section 8, and other income supports to keep a person housed. As the cost of housing goes up, the number of people who fall from the margins of "housed" to "homeless" goes concomitantly up. So yes, mental illness and drug abuse are factors, but they're factors exacerbated by housing costs, and they're really red herrings relative to overall housing costs.
The homelessness problem is intractable without zoning reform, and the removal of barriers to new housing, whether those barriers are height maximums, parking space minimums, or "neighborhood input" or "community input," both of which are functionally barriers to building anything, anywhere.
Homelessness is mostly a housing problem: https://www.slowboring.com/p/homelessness-housing. We can and should remove barriers to building new housing, and, until we do that, we're going to keep seeing these problems. CA SB-9 and SB-10 are steps in the right direction but they're very small steps. Tokyo's approach would be better: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16704501. Even places like New York are proposing density reductions, insanely: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-ny/coronavirus/202....
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Betteridge's law of headlines says there isn't.
And of course, the law holds true here. There is a crisis in some parts of the US but overall, the homeless rate has been relatively stable.
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#8Yes. Yes there is.
Can you please not post unsubstantive comments to HN? We're trying for higher-quality discussion, to the extent that that's possible on the internet. This is particularly important when a thread is fresh because threads are so sensitive to initial conditions. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#9Solution in two parts
1. Make it legal to build homes where people live (looking at you California, specifically LA, SF, SV)
2. Build dorm style shelters for anyone that would otherwise sleep outside
There's complicating issues like not enough addiction treatment and mental health facilities, but neither of those is improved by leaving people to sleep on the street.
Re: Breakdown of data on homeless populations across the U.S.
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you please not post unsubstantive comments to HN? We're trying for higher-quality discussion, to the extent that that's possible on the internet. This is particularly important when a thread is fresh because threads are so sensitive to initial conditions. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
So you'll allow a title that ask a question.. and then someone answers it and you have an issue with their answer? How do you pretend to claim to know that there isn't a homeless criss?