Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Jokes at someone else’s expense = bad” seems to me like it literally* requires some social awareness. * in its original definition
What definition are you using? The idea that autistics don't empathize is, put it simply, false. And difficulty reading social cues doesn't apply in cases where many, many, many people openly and directly explain why jokes at someone else's expense are bad (and correlate with the people being the butt of the joke being mistreated). I have deconstructed the rape joke in another comment. Maybe to you immediately feel w…
Literally to mean “in a literal sense; exactly” not the novel accepted usage to include meaning “figuratively, not literally”.